%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-12 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-10,
    number =    {draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-10},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis/10/},
    author =    {Tadahiko Ito and Clint Wilson and Corey Bonnell and Sean Turner},
    title =     {{Updates to Lightweight OCSP Profile for High Volume Environments}},
    pagetotal = 36,
    year =      2024,
    month =     aug,
    day =       11,
    abstract =  {This specification defines a profile of the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) that addresses the scalability issues inherent when using OCSP in large scale (high volume) Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) environments and/or in PKI environments that require a lightweight solution to minimize communication bandwidth and client- side processing. This specification obsoletes RFC 5019. The profile specified in RFC 5019 has been updated to allow and recommend the use of SHA-256 over SHA-1.},
}