IMAP URL Scheme
draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-09
Yes
(Lisa Dusseault)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jon Peterson)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Sam Hartman)
(Tim Polk)
Recuse
(Chris Newman)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-08-20)
Unknown
FYI: I verified the ABNF -- its OK, or at least it compiles.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-08-22)
Unknown
Please check all uses of "optional" and "optionally" in the document - IMO they should all become RFC2119 OPTIONALs.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-08-16)
Unknown
Please turn off hyphenation. At the bottom of each page, I expect the authors to be "Melnikov & Newman" (not "Newman & Co"). It looks like the usual postprocessor was not used since the bottom of each page includes "FORMFEED[Page x]". Section 6.1.1.2 says: > > The mailbox access key is a random string with at least 128 bits of > entropy. It is generated by software (not by the human user), and > MUST be unpredictable. > As written, I do not think this is an easily tested MUST statement. So, I suggest dropping the MUST statement. I propose: > > The mailbox access key is an unpredictable, random string. To > ensure unpredictability, the random string with at least 128 bits of > entropy is generated by software or hardware (not by the human user).
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown