%% You should probably cite rfc9304 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-00,
    number =    {draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8113bis/00/},
    author =    {Mohamed Boucadair and Christian Jacquenet},
    title =     {{Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message \& IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations}},
    pagetotal = 5,
    year =      2018,
    month =     sep,
    day =       27,
    abstract =  {This document specifies a Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) shared message type for defining future extensions and conducting experiments without consuming a LISP packet type codepoint for each extension. This document obsoletes RFC 8113. This document updates I-D.ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis.},
}