Skip to main content

Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations
draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-06

Yes

(Deborah Brungard)

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja K├╝hlewind)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana (was Discuss) No Objection

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -04)

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-30 for -04)
I would also like to see Alvaro's concerns handled.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-31 for -04)
- 4.1, last paragraph: I'm confused by the statement that "15" is reserved for experimental use. The table says it's reserved for the LISP Shared Extension Message. I recognize that that message is in fact experimental, but I would interpret "reserved for experimental use" to indicate things that people can use for other experimental purpose.



- (nit)  Abstract: Please expand LISP on first use in the abstract (in addition to the existing expansion in the introduction.)

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Mirja K├╝hlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2017-01-31 for -04)
I am watching for resolution of Alvaro's Discuss points.

I'm also really curious about point a in his Comments. That would be good to unravel.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)

                            

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2017-02-02 for -05)
Thanks for taking care of my DISCUSS.

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -04)