Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations
draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-06
Yes
(Deborah Brungard)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-01-30 for -04)
Unknown
I would also like to see Alvaro's concerns handled.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-02-01 for -04)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-01-31 for -04)
Unknown
- 4.1, last paragraph: I'm confused by the statement that "15" is reserved for experimental use. The table says it's reserved for the LISP Shared Extension Message. I recognize that that message is in fact experimental, but I would interpret "reserved for experimental use" to indicate things that people can use for other experimental purpose. - (nit) Abstract: Please expand LISP on first use in the abstract (in addition to the existing expansion in the introduction.)
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-01-31 for -04)
Unknown
I am watching for resolution of Alvaro's Discuss points. I'm also really curious about point a in his Comments. That would be good to unravel.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-02-02 for -05)
Unknown
Thanks for taking care of my DISCUSS.
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown