%% You should probably cite rfc6830 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-lisp-24, number = {draft-ietf-lisp-24}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp/24/}, author = {Dino Farinacci and Vince Fuller and David Meyer and Darrel Lewis}, title = {{The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)}}, pagetotal = 75, year = 2012, month = nov, day = 13, abstract = {This document describes a network-layer-based protocol that enables separation of IP addresses into two new numbering spaces: Endpoint Identifiers (EIDs) and Routing Locators (RLOCs). No changes are required to either host protocol stacks or to the "core" of the Internet infrastructure. The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) can be incrementally deployed, without a "flag day", and offers Traffic Engineering, multihoming, and mobility benefits to early adopters, even when there are relatively few LISP-capable sites. Design and development of LISP was largely motivated by the problem statement produced by the October 2006 IAB Routing and Addressing Workshop. This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.}, }