Area Proxy for IS-IS
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-08
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Tony Li , Sarah Chen , Vivek Ilangovan , Gyan Mishra | ||
| Last updated | 2022-11-18 (Latest revision 2022-05-16) | ||
| Replaces | draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
GENART Last Call review
(of
-10)
by Peter Yee
Ready w/nits
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Christian Hopps | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Link state routing protocols have hierarchical abstraction already built into them. However, when lower levels are used for transit, they must expose their internal topologies to each other, leading to scale issues. To avoid this, this document discusses extensions to the IS-IS routing protocol that would allow level 1 areas to provide transit, yet only inject an abstraction of the level 1 topology into level 2. Each level 1 area is represented as a single level 2 node, thereby enabling greater scale.
Authors
Tony Li
Sarah Chen
Vivek Ilangovan
Gyan Mishra
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)