%% You should probably cite rfc8570 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-05, number = {draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis/05/}, author = {Les Ginsberg and Stefano Previdi and Spencer Giacalone and David Ward and John Drake and Qin Wu}, title = {{IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions}}, pagetotal = 21, year = 2018, month = dec, day = 20, abstract = {In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network-performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to data-path selection as other metrics. This document describes extensions to IS-IS Traffic Engineering Extensions (RFC 5305). These extensions provide a way to distribute and collect network-performance information in a scalable fashion. The information distributed using IS-IS TE Metric Extensions can then be used to make path-selection decisions based on network performance. Note that this document only covers the mechanisms with which network-performance information is distributed. The mechanisms for measuring network performance or acting on that information, once distributed, are outside the scope of this document. This document obsoletes RFC 7810.}, }