%% You should probably cite rfc9355 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-10,
    number =    {draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-10},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/10/},
    author =    {Ketan Talaulikar and Peter Psenak and Albert Fu and Rajesh Shetty},
    title =     {{OSPF Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Strict-Mode}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2022,
    month =     oct,
    day =       6,
    abstract =  {This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation. Link-Local Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise the requirement for strict-mode BFD session establishment for an OSPF adjacency. If both OSPF neighbors advertise BFD strict-mode, adjacency formation will be blocked until a BFD session has been successfully established. This document updates RFC 2328 by augmenting the OSPF neighbor state machine with a check for BFD session up before progression from Init to 2-Way state when operating in OSPF BFD strict-mode.},
}