Using the Server-Based Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP) to Convey Long-Term Evidence Records
draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-07
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
07 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley |
2008-06-24
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2008-06-23
|
07 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2008-06-23
|
07 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2008-06-23
|
07 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2008-06-23
|
07 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2008-06-23
|
07 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2008-06-20
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-07.txt |
2008-06-20
|
07 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-06-19 |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] A review by Christian Vogt: This document specifies extensions to the Server-based Certificate Validation Protocol to inquire about changes on the certification path … [Ballot comment] A review by Christian Vogt: This document specifies extensions to the Server-based Certificate Validation Protocol to inquire about changes on the certification path of a certificate of interest. Such changes may happen due to expiry of previous certificates, or due to replacement of compromised cryptographic algorithms. The document is in good shape. I have one main comment though, which I think should be addressed before forwarding this document for publication: The specified technique enables the establishment of trust into a certificate even after certificates in the certification path have changed. To which extent can this be used when certificates have been revoked explicitly? Suggest adding a discussion on this. Some smaller comments: - Abstract: SCVP is the *Server-based* Certificate Validation Protocol, not the Simple Certificate Validation Protocol. - Abstract/Introduction: The document is unclear about the purpose of the technique it specifies. Although the document states in its abstract that it defines an extension to SCVP, the ultimate purpose of this extension remains a bit blurry. - Security considerations: It is unclear which security vulnerabilities this section is trying to address. It seems that the section focuses on possible protocol extensions, or alternative ways to realize the protocol. This is not what the Security Considerations section is to be used for; it should instead focus on security aspects of the specified protocol itself. - Appendix A: Suggest adding an introductory paragraph that explains the ASN.1 constructs defined in this appendix and their relation to the protocol elements defined earlier in the document. |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
2008-06-19
|
07 | David Ward | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2008-06-19
|
07 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson |
2008-06-18
|
07 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
2008-06-18
|
07 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
2008-06-15
|
07 | Russ Housley | [Ballot discuss] At least one ASN.1 compiler cannot handle LTANS_SCVP_EXTENSION as a module name. I suggest using LTANS-SCVP-EXTENSION instead. |
2008-06-15
|
07 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2008-06-09
|
07 | Tim Polk | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-06-19 by Tim Polk |
2008-05-30
|
07 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Kurt Zeilenga. |
2008-05-29
|
07 | Tim Polk | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Tim Polk |
2008-05-29
|
07 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk |
2008-05-29
|
07 | Tim Polk | Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk |
2008-05-29
|
07 | Tim Polk | Created "Approve" ballot |
2008-05-27
|
07 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2008-05-20
|
07 | Amanda Baber | IANA Last Call comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2008-05-15
|
07 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Kurt Zeilenga |
2008-05-15
|
07 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Kurt Zeilenga |
2008-05-13
|
07 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2008-05-13
|
07 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2008-05-13
|
07 | Tim Polk | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk |
2008-05-13
|
07 | Tim Polk | Last Call was requested by Tim Polk |
2008-05-13
|
07 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2008-05-13
|
07 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2008-05-13
|
07 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2008-02-22
|
07 | Tim Polk | Draft Added by Tim Polk in state Publication Requested |
2008-02-14
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-06.txt |
2007-11-16
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-05.txt |
2007-11-08
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-04.txt |
2007-06-20
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-03.txt |
2007-02-13
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-02.txt |
2006-05-17
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-01.txt |
2005-09-29
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-00.txt |