Initial Language Subtag Registry
draft-ietf-ltru-initial-06

Shepherd write-up:

1.a) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet
Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID is ready
to forward to the IESG for publication?

Yes.

1.b) Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members
and key non-WG members?  Do you have any concerns about the
depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed?

The document has been reviewed by several WG members.  We have requested
reviews from several WG non-members, but have not gotten any responses.
We are not concerned about the depth or breadth of the reviews performed.

1.c) Do you have concerns that the document needs more review from a
particular (broader) perspective (e.g., security, operational
complexity, someone familiar with AAA, etc.)?

No.

1.d) Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document that
you believe the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of?  For
example, perhaps you are uncomfortable with certain parts of the
document, or have concerns whether there really is a need for
it.  In any event, if your issues have been discussed in the WG
and the WG has indicated it that it still wishes to advance the
document, detail those concerns in the write-up.

No.

1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it
represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with
others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and
agree with it?

Strong consensus of the active participants; have not seen any opposition
to this document.  However, see answers for closely related registry draft.

1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme
discontent?  If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in
separate email to the Responsible Area Director.

No.  However, see answers for the closely related registry draft.

1.g) Have the chairs verified that the document adheres to all of the
ID nits? (see http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html).

Yes.

1.h) Is the document split into normative and informative references?

Yes.

Are there normative references to IDs, where the IDs are not
also ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state?

No.