DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension-21

Yes

Jim Guichard

No Objection

Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Gunter Van de Velde
Mahesh Jethanandani
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Éric Vyncke
(John Scudder)
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Zaheduzzaman Sarker)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 20 and is now closed.

Jim Guichard
Yes
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2025-02-02 for -20) Sent 
Section 4:  If changes are made to update the Security Consideration sections of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification and draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control, I recommend this draft reference one or both of those drafts.

Section 4:  Wildcards are literally mentioned only in the Introduction and here. I certainly don't mind the recommendation in this section, but should this be a standalone paragraph?  And should it appear in some/all of the other drafts in the group? 

Section 4, last sentence:  Does this apply to the wildcard topic?  Or something else, maybe the second sentence?  I think this section could use some restructuring.
Erik Kline
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2025-03-04) Sent 
Thanks for addressing my comments.
Orie Steele
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Comment (2025-02-03 for -20) Not sent 
I support Deb's DISCUSS/COMMENTS on the Security Considerations for these documents
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2025-02-04 for -20) Not sent 
Thank you to Paul Kyzivat for the GENART review.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2025-02-05 for -20) Sent 
One small comment —

“when both DiffServ and Ethernet traffic classification are specified for a flow, the Ethertype information takes precedence”

I guess you mean “Ethernet”, not “Ethertype”.
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -20) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2025-02-06 for -20)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
I could not escape the question that why is this a separete document.