DLEP IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window Extension
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-08
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 9895.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | David Wiggins , Lou Berger , Donald E. Eastlake 3rd | ||
| Last updated | 2025-02-06 (Latest revision 2024-12-15) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
INTDIR Telechat review
by Carlos Jesús Bernardos
Ready w/nits
TSVART Early review
(of
-02)
by David Black
On the right track
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Document shepherd | Ronald in 't Velt | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2024-05-10 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 9895 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Jim Guichard | ||
| Send notices to | ronald.intvelt@tno.nl | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - Actions Needed | |
| IANA expert review state | Expert Reviews OK |
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-08
MANET D. Wiggins
Internet-Draft
Intended status: Standards Track L. Berger
Expires: 18 June 2025 LabN Consulting, L.L.C.
D. Eastlake, Ed.
Independent
15 December 2024
DLEP IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window Extension
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-ether-credit-extension-08
Abstract
This document defines an extension to the Dynamic Link Exchange
Protocol (DLEP) that enables an Ethernet IEEE 802.1Q aware credit-
window scheme for destination-specific and shared flow control.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 18 June 2025.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Wiggins, et al. Expires 18 June 2025 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft DLEP Ethernet Credit Extension December 2024
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Key Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Extension Usage and Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Management Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Appendix A. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1. Introduction
The Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) is defined in [RFC8175].
This protocol provides the exchange of link related control
information between DLEP peers. DLEP peers consist of a modem and a
router. DLEP defines a base set of mechanisms as well as support for
possible extensions. This document defines one such extension.
The DLEP specification does not include any flow control capability.
There are various flow control techniques theoretically possible with
DLEP. This document defines a DLEP extension which provides an
Ethernet-based flow control mechanism for traffic sent from a router
to a modem. Flow control is provided using one or more logical
"Credit Windows", each of which will typically be supported by an
associated virtual or physical queue. A router will use traffic flow
classification information provided by the modem to identify which
traffic is associated with each credit window. Credit windows may be
shared or dedicated on a per flow basis. See
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension] for a DiffServ-based
version of credit window flow control. As specified in Section 2.3.1
of [I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification], when both DiffServ
and Ethernet traffic classification are specified for a flow, the
Ethertype information takes precedence.
This document uses the traffic classification and credit window
control mechanisms defined in
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] and
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control] to provide credit window
based flow control based on DLEP destinations and Ethernet VLANs and
Priority Code Points. Ethernet Priority Code Point support is
defined as part of the IEEE 802.1Q [IEEE8021Q] tag format and
includes a 3-bit "PCP" field. The tag format also includes a 12-bit
VLAN identifier (VID) field. The defined mechanism allows for credit
windows to be shared across traffic sent to multiple DLEP
Wiggins, et al. Expires 18 June 2025 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft DLEP Ethernet Credit Extension December 2024
destinations, Virtual Area Netwokrs (VLANs), and Priority Code Points
(PCPs), or used exclusively for traffic sent to a particular
destination and/or VLAN and/or PCP. The extension also supports the
"wildcard" matching of any PCP or VID.
The extension defined in this document is referred to as "IEEE 802.1Q
Aware Credit Window" or, more simply, the "Ethernet Credit"
extension. The reader should be familiar with both the traffic
classification and credit window control mechanisms defined in
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] and
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control].
This document defines a new DLEP Extension Type Value in Section 2
which is used to indicate support for the extension.
1.1. Key Words
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. Extension Usage and Identification
The extension defined in this document is composed of the mechanisms
and processing defined in
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] and
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control]. To indicate that the IEEE
802.1Q Aware Credit Window Extension is to be used, an implementation
MUST include the IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window Type Value in the
Extensions Supported Data Item. The Extensions Supported Data Item
is sent and processed according to [RFC8175]. Any implementation
that indicates use of the IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window Extension
MUST support all Messages, Data Items, the Ethernet Traffic
Classification Sub-Data Item, and all related processing defined in
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] and
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control].
The IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window Extension Type Value is TBA1, see
Section 5.
3. Management Considerations
This section provides several network management guidelines to
implementations supporting the IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window
Extension.
Wiggins, et al. Expires 18 June 2025 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft DLEP Ethernet Credit Extension December 2024
If this extension is supported, that support MUST be declared using
the Extensions Supported Data Item (see Section 13.6 of [RFC8175])
which is configurable on both modens and routers. DiffServ Aware
Credit Window Extension Data Items MUST NOT be emitted by a DLEP
participant unless such support was specified in the initialization
message received from its peer. The use of the extension defined in
this document SHOULD be configurable on both modems and routers.
Modems SHOULD support the configuration of PCP to credit window
(queue) mapping.
Modems MAY support the configuration of PCP to credit window (queue)
mapping on a per VLAN basis. VID value zero (0) is used by
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] to indicate that VID is
ignored and any VID value is used in traffic classification.
When VLANs are supported by a modem without support from PCPs, the
modem SHOULD support the configuration of VLAN to credit window
(queue) mapping.
Modems MAY support the configuration of the number of credit windows
(queues) to advertise to a router.
Routers may have limits on the number of queues that they can support
and limits on supported credit window combinations. Per destination
queues might not be supported at all. When modem-provided credit
window information exceeds the capabilities of a router, the router
SHOULD use a subset of the provided credit windows. Alternatively, a
router MAY reset the session and indicate that the extension is not
supported. In either case, the mismatch of capabilities SHOULD be
reported to the user via normal network management mechanisms such as
user interface messages or error logging.
In all cases, if credit windows are in use, traffic for which credits
are not available MUST NOT be sent to the modem by the router.
4. Security Considerations
This document defines a DLEP extension that uses DLEP mechanisms and
the credit window control and flow mechanisms defined in
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification] and
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control]. The defined extension is
exposed to vulnerabilities similar to existing DLEP messages and
discussed in the Security Considerations section of [RFC8175] such as
an injected message resizing a credit window to a value that results
in a denial of service. Wildcards for matching PCP and VID fields
are provided which may be convenient to match a number of packet
flows but could inadvertently match unexpected flows or new flows
Wiggins, et al. Expires 18 June 2025 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft DLEP Ethernet Credit Extension December 2024
that appear after the wildcard matching has been set up. It is
therefore RECOMMENDED that wildcards not be used unless clearly
needed. The security mechanisms documented in [RFC8175] can be
applied equally to the mechanism defined in this document.
5. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to assign one code point in the "Extension Type
Values" registry in the "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)
Parameters" registry group as follows:
+======+=================================+
| Code | Description |
+======+=================================+
| TBA1 | IEEE 802.1Q Aware Credit Window |
+------+---------------------------------+
Table 1: Requested Extension Type Value
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-credit-flow-control]
Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., Ratliff, S., and E.
Kinzie, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Credit-
Based Flow Control Messages and Data Items", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-dlep-credit-
flow-control-16, 19 November 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-manet-
dlep-credit-flow-control-16>.
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-traffic-classification]
Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. Fedyk, "Dynamic
Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Traffic Classification Data
Item", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-
dlep-traffic-classification-13, 19 November 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-manet-
dlep-traffic-classification-13>.
[IEEE8021Q]
IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area
Networks--Bridges and Bridged Networks",
DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2022.10004498, IEEE 802.1Q-2022, July
2022, <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8403927>.
Wiggins, et al. Expires 18 June 2025 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft DLEP Ethernet Credit Extension December 2024
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8175] Ratliff, S., Jury, S., Satterwhite, D., Taylor, R., and B.
Berry, "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)", RFC 8175,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8175, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8175>.
6.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension]
Cheng, B., Wiggins, D., Berger, L., and D. E. E. 3rd,
"DLEP DiffServ Aware Credit Window Extension", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-
extension-20, 15 December 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/api/v1/doc/document/draft-
ietf-manet-dlep-da-credit-extension/>.
Appendix A. Acknowledgments
The document was motivated by discussions in the MANET working group.
Many useful comments were received from contributors to the MANET
working group, notably Ronald in't Velt.
We had the honor of working too briefly with David Wiggins on this
and related DLEP work. His contribution to the IETF and publication
of the first and definitive open source DLEP implementation have been
critical to the acceptance of DLEP. We mourn his passing on November
23, 2023. We wish to recognize his guidance, leadership and
professional excellence. We were fortunate to benefit from his
leadership and friendship. He shall be missed.
Authors' Addresses
David Wiggins
Email: david@none.org
Lou Berger
LabN Consulting, L.L.C.
Email: lberger@labn.net
Wiggins, et al. Expires 18 June 2025 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft DLEP Ethernet Credit Extension December 2024
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (editor)
Independent
2386 Panoramic Circle
Apopka, Florida 32703
United States of America
Phone: +1-508-333-2270
Email: d3e3e3@gmail.com
Wiggins, et al. Expires 18 June 2025 [Page 7]