Skip to main content

IANA Allocations for Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Protocols
draft-ietf-manet-iana-07

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from manet-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Ward
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Abstain position for Sam Hartman
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2009-03-16
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2009-03-16
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5498' added by Amy Vezza
2009-03-13
07 (System) RFC published
2007-12-06
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2007-12-06
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2007-12-06
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2007-11-28
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2007-11-26
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-11-20
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2007-11-20
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-11-20
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-11-20
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-11-20
07 Ross Callon State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ross Callon
2007-11-20
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2007-11-20
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2007-11-18
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2007-11-18
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-07.txt
2007-11-08
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2007-10-29
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2007-10-26
07 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
I believe the process issue of responding to Sam Weiler's comments has been addressed so I'm clearly.
I'll let those with real content …
[Ballot comment]
I believe the process issue of responding to Sam Weiler's comments has been addressed so I'm clearly.
I'll let those with real content discusses consider whether this draft should be approved.
2007-10-26
07 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to Abstain from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2007-10-26
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-10-26
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-06.txt
2007-09-07
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-09-06
2007-09-06
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2007-09-06
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2007-09-06
07 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2007-09-06
07 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2007-09-06
07 Chris Newman [Ballot comment]
I agree with other discuss issues, particularly Tim's one.  I trust those
other ADs to hold their discuss votes as necessary.
2007-09-06
07 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2007-09-06
07 Mark Townsley [Ballot comment]
+1 to Lars' Comment. I understand why this document was proposed, but it needs more work.
2007-09-06
07 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2007-09-05
07 Ross Callon
It has been pointed out that the WG chair who provided the PROTO writeup and who requested publication is also the document author. We should …
It has been pointed out that the WG chair who provided the PROTO writeup and who requested publication is also the document author. We should clarify that when a chair is author the other WG chair needs to operate as chair, and we need to verify that the other chair is okay with this and agrees with judged WG consensus.
2007-09-05
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot comment]
Agree with Lar's DISCUSS, but happy to let him hold the DISCUSS
2007-09-05
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Jari Arkko
2007-09-05
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
I basically agree with other comments and discusses that have been filed.

Having said that, I support the idea of this document and …
[Ballot comment]
I basically agree with other comments and discusses that have been filed.

Having said that, I support the idea of this document and the allocations; but I want to see how the protocols live on that same port number, or some statement that all further protocols will use that port number.
2007-09-05
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2007-09-05
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
The phrase "MANET protocols" is meaningful to the authors and the wg participants, but
will be very difficult for readers to sort out.  …
[Ballot discuss]
The phrase "MANET protocols" is meaningful to the authors and the wg participants, but
will be very difficult for readers to sort out.  This document also seems to conflict with
RFC 3561 (a "MANET protocol" by my interpretation!):
          "All AODV messages are sent to port 654 using UDP."
RFC 3626 (OLSR) - another "MANET protocol" - uses port 698.

Does this document override these assignments?  The document should enumerate which
protocols are sharing the UDP port number to be assigned.  Ditto for the addresses.

The security considerations section should address any security considerations that can arise
when MANET protocols share the well-known port and/or addresses, or explain why this
doesn't create any problems.
2007-09-05
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2007-09-05
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
I think this would need to specify which protcol ran on this port and multicast address.
2007-09-05
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2007-09-05
07 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
Serious comments raised in a secdir review from Sam Weiler have not
received any response from the authors.  These largely overlap with
existing …
[Ballot discuss]
Serious comments raised in a secdir review from Sam Weiler have not
received any response from the authors.  These largely overlap with
existing discusses, so I'm only holding a discuss for the process
issue not for the technical content.
2007-09-05
07 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2007-09-05
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
IANA asked for some minor changes:
  >
  > NOTE: The IANA Considerations Section should point back
  > to section 2 …
[Ballot discuss]
IANA asked for some minor changes:
  >
  > NOTE: The IANA Considerations Section should point back
  > to section 2 or should replicate the request for a Well
  > Known Port.
  >
  The note to the RFC Editor does not include this change.
2007-09-05
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2007-09-04
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2007-09-04
07 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Ward has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Ward
2007-09-04
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 2:
>  Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the  Mobile
>                  Ad …
[Ballot comment]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 2:
>  Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Allocations for the  Mobile
>                  Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group

  Code points aren't allocated to working groups, they are allocated to
  protocols and applications. Suggest to rephrase this in the title,
  abstract and body of the document.
2007-09-04
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
DISCUSS: Allocation of a well-known (system) UDP port requires at
  least  a specification (see http://www.iana.org/numbers.html; for
  non-IETF requests, even more information …
[Ballot discuss]
DISCUSS: Allocation of a well-known (system) UDP port requires at
  least  a specification (see http://www.iana.org/numbers.html; for
  non-IETF requests, even more information would be required; see
  http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/sys-port-number.pl). Although this
  document is standards-track, it contains no such specification and
  also does not normatively cite any such specification. It does mention
  "MANET WG protocols", but it is unclear which of those this port is
  for, and how different MANET protocols can share the same UDP port.
2007-09-04
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-09-03
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2007-08-29
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Sam Weiler.
2007-08-27
07 David Ward
[Ballot discuss]
The only issue I had with the IANA draft is that they're going to all the  trouble to reserve port numbers, but won't …
[Ballot discuss]
The only issue I had with the IANA draft is that they're going to all the  trouble to reserve port numbers, but won't consider reserving an IP protocol number.
2007-08-27
07 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Ward
2007-08-21
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Weiler
2007-08-21
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Weiler
2007-08-18
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2007-08-16
07 Cullen Jennings Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-09-06 by Cullen Jennings
2007-08-16
07 Ron Bonica Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-09-06 by Ron Bonica
2007-08-12
07 Yoshiko Fong
IANA Additional Comments:

> ***
> NOTE: The IANA Considerations Section should point back
> to section 2 or should replicate the request for a …
IANA Additional Comments:

> ***
> NOTE: The IANA Considerations Section should point back
> to section 2 or should replicate the request for a Well
> Known Port.
> ***

I will add this to my list of minor changes.

> http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>
> sub-registry "WELL KNOWN PORT NUMBERS"
>
>
> Keyword Decimal Description References
> ------- ------- ----------- ----------
> manet [tbd]/udp Manet Protocol [RFC-manet-iana-05]
>

Can this please be revised to show?

manet [tbd]/udp MANET Protocols [RFC-manet-iana-05]

> http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses
>
> sub-registry "224.0.0.0 - 224.0.0.255 (224.0.0/24)
> Local Network Control Block Date registered"
>
> 224.0.0.TBD2 LL MANET Routers [RFC-manet-iana-05]

As per a request during IETF LC, we plan to revise the address name to
be LL-MANET-Routers, to keep DNS happy.


> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-multicast-addresses
>
> sub-registry "Fixed Scope Multicast Addresses"
>
> sub-sub-registry "Link-Local Scope"
>
>
> FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:TBD3 LL MANET Routers [RFC-manet-iana-05]

As per a request during IETF LC, we plan to revise the address name to
be LL-MANET-Routers, to make DNS happy.
2007-08-10
07 Yoshiko Fong
IANA Last Call Comments:

***
NOTE: The IANA Considerations Section should point back
to section 2 or should replicate the request for a Well
Known …
IANA Last Call Comments:

***
NOTE: The IANA Considerations Section should point back
to section 2 or should replicate the request for a Well
Known Port.
***


Action 1:

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make
the following assignments in the "PORT NUMBERS"
registry located at

http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

sub-registry "WELL KNOWN PORT NUMBERS"


Keyword Decimal Description References
------- ------- ----------- ----------
manet [tbd]/udp Manet Protocol [RFC-manet-iana-05]


NOTE: The IANA Considerations Section should point
back to section 2 or should replicate the request
for a Well Known Port.


Action 2:

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make
the following assignments in the "Internet Multicast
Addresses" registry located at

http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses

sub-registry "224.0.0.0 - 224.0.0.255 (224.0.0/24)
Local Network Control Block Date registered"

224.0.0.TBD2 LL MANET Routers [RFC-manet-iana-05]

Action 3:

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make
the following assignments in the "INTERNET PROTOCOL
VERSION 6 MULTICAST ADDRESSES" registry located at

http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-multicast-addresses

sub-registry "Fixed Scope Multicast Addresses"

sub-sub-registry "Link-Local Scope"


FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:TBD3 LL MANET Routers [RFC-manet-iana-05]

[ NOTE: this registry requires expert review ]

We understand the above to be the only IANA Actions
for this document.
2007-08-04
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-08-04
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-08-02
07 Ross Callon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-09-06 by Ross Callon
2007-08-02
07 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ross Callon
2007-08-02
07 Ross Callon Ballot has been issued by Ross Callon
2007-08-02
07 Ross Callon Created "Approve" ballot
2007-08-02
07 Ross Callon Last Call was requested by Ross Callon
2007-08-02
07 Ross Callon State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Ross Callon
2007-08-02
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-08-02
07 (System) Last call text was added
2007-08-02
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-08-02
07 Ross Callon State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Ross Callon
2007-06-12
07 Ross Callon Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2007-06-12
07 Ross Callon
Proto writeup by Ian Chakeres:

  1. Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe …
Proto writeup by Ian Chakeres:

  1. Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this ID is ready to forward to the IESG for publication?

YES.

  2. Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members and key non-WG members? Do you have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed?

YES the ID has been reviewed. NO there is no concern about the reviews.

  3. Do you have concerns that the document needs more review from a particular (broader) perspective (e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with AAA, etc.)?

NO.

  4. Do you have any specific concerns/issues with this document that you believe the ADs and/or IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps you are uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or have concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if your issues have been discussed in the WG and the WG has indicated it that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns in the write-up.

NO.

  5. How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it?

STRONG - Several other WG documents contain normative references to this ID.

  6. Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarize the areas of conflict in  separate email to the Responsible Area Director.

NO.

  7. Have the chairs verified that the document adheres to all of the ID Checklist items ?

YES.

  8. Is the document split into normative and informative references?
Are there normative references to IDs, where the IDs are not also ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? (note here that the RFC editor will not publish an RFC with normative references to IDs, it will delay publication until all such IDs are also ready for publication as RFCs.)

YES.

  9. What is the intended status of the document? (e.g., Proposed Standard, Informational?)

Proposed Standard.

  10. For Standards Track and BCP documents, the IESG approval announcement includes a write-up section with the following sections:

          * Technical Summary

This document requests IANA allocate a UDP port and link-local multicast addresses (IPv4 & IPv6) for communication between MANET routers.

          * Working Group Summary

Three WG protocols use link-local messaging for coordination among MANET routers. All these protocols will use the IANA allocations laid out in this document. There was discussion of whether site-local multicast addresses should be allocated. The WG decided to not allocate site-local multicast addresses at this time, because they are not required by the current WG documents.

          * Protocol Quality

This document does not define a protocol. It specifies IANA allocations for other WG protocols.
2007-06-11
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-05.txt
2007-06-07
07 Ross Callon Draft Added by Ross Callon in state Publication Requested
2007-05-29
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-04.txt
2007-05-18
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-03.txt
2007-05-10
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-02.txt
2007-04-16
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-01.txt
2007-02-26
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-manet-iana-00.txt