Simplified Multicast Forwarding
draft-ietf-manet-smf-14
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-01 for -13)
Unknown
- In 6.1.3 and 6.2.2 it says SHA-1 is used to produce a 128 bit value. Which of the 160 output bits are used? (Not sure if that's in 4302 or not - short of time, sorry:-) - Even though you're not depending much on SHA-1 collision resistance, if you could, using SHA-256 would be a better choice today. - 54 pages is a lot for something with "Simplified" in the title.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-19)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing my concern
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -13)
Unknown