Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
draft-ietf-martini-gin-13
Yes
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
No Objection
(David Harrington)
(Lars Eggert)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2011-01-19)
Unknown
The examples in section 8 have bugs that are important to fix before publication. The Call-ID changes unintentionally in each example. The messages that have two Via header field values have the values in the wrong order.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-20)
Unknown
AOR is used without expansion in the abstract.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-19)
Unknown
In Section 7.1.2: All base64 encoding discussed in the following sections MUST use the character set and encoding defined in RFC 2045 [1], RFC 4648 is a better reference here. except that any trailing "=" characters are discarded on encoding, and added as necessary to decode. In Section 7.1.2.1: SHA256-80 needs a reference and an explanation (i.e. that the output of the hash function is truncated to 80 bits). The first reference to TLS needs an Informative reference.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-18)
Unknown
The OPS-DIR review by Warren Kumari signalled a number of nits which would be useful to fix: Abstract: In the abstract many acronyms are expanded (SIP, SIP-PBX, UA), but AOR is not. Having them all expanded (or none expanded) would be nice. Section 4: Globally Routable UA URI's (GRUU) are first mentioned, but the reference to the RFC is in section 7.1. Section 5.1: Acronym "UAC" not expanded / defined. Section 6: s/An SSP using this mechanism/A SSP using this mechanism/ Section 7.1.2.1 (indented): s/The registrar maintains a counter, I. this counter is/The registrar maintains a counter, I. This counter is/ (Capitalization of 't').
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-20)
Unknown
(author adding some text) Section 7.1.2.2: Seems like there should be a pointer to RFC 4086 for the "D" method.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown