Lightweight Internet Group Management Protocol Version 3 (IGMPv3) and Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) Protocols
draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-06
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 5790.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Wei Cao , Hui Liu , Hitoshi Asaeda | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2009-10-14) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 5790 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Ron Bonica | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-06
MBONED Working Group H. Liu
Internet-Draft W. Cao
Intended status: Standards Track Huawei Technologies
Expires: April 17, 2010 H. Asaeda
Keio University
October 14, 2009
Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Protocols
draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-06
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. This document may contain material
from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly
available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the
copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF
Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the
IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from
the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this
document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and
derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards
Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to
translate it into languages other than English.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 17, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
Abstract
This document describes lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 protocols (LW-
IGMPv3 and LW-MLDv2), which simplify the standard (full) versions of
IGMPv3 and MLDv2. The interoperability with the full versions and
the previous versions of IGMP and MLD is also taken into account.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3. Simplification Method Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1. Behavior of Group Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2. Behavior of Multicast Routers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. LW-IGMPv3 Protocol for Group Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1. Query and Report Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.2. Action on Change of Interface State . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3. Action on Reception of a Query . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.4. LW-IGMPv3 Group Record Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5. LW-IGMPv3 Protocol for Multicast Routers . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.1. Group Timers and Source Timers in the Lightweight
Version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.2. Source-Specific Forwarding Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.3. Reception of Current-State Records . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.4. Reception of Source-List-Change and Filter-Mode-Change
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
6. Interoperability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.1. Interoperation with the Full Version of IGMPv3/MLDv2 . . . 16
6.1.1. Behavior of Group Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.1.2. Behavior of Multicast Routers . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.2. Interoperation with IGMPv1/IGMPv2 . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.2.1. Behavior of Group Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.2.2. Behavior of Multicast Routers . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.3. Interoperation with MLDv1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
7. Implementation Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
7.1. Implementation of Source-Specific Multicast . . . . . . . 19
7.2. Implementation of Multicast Source Filter (MSF) APIs . . . 19
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
1. Introduction
IGMP version 3 [2] and MLD version 2 [3] implement source filtering
capabilities that are not supported by their earlier versions, IGMPv1
[4], IGMPv2 [5] and MLDv1 [6]. An IGMPv3 or MLDv2 capable host can
tell its upstream router which group it would like to join by
specifying which sources it does or does not intend to receive
multicast traffic from. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 add the capability for a
multicast router to learn sources which are of interest or which are
of not interested for a particular multicast address. This
information is used during forwarding of multicast data packets.
INCLUDE and EXCLUDE filter-modes are introduced to support the source
filtering function. If a host wants to receive from specific
sources, it sends an IGMPv3 or MLDv2 report with filter-mode set to
INCLUDE. If the host does not want to receive from some sources, it
sends a report with filter-mode set to EXCLUDE. A source list for
the given sources shall be included in the report message.
INCLUDE and EXCLUDE filter modes are also defined in a multicast
router to process the IGMPv3 or MLDv2 reports. When a multicast
router receives the report messages from its downstream hosts, it
forwards the corresponding multicast traffic by managing requested
group and source addresses. Group timers and source timers are used
to maintain the forwarding state of desired groups and sources under
certain filter modes. When a group report arrives or a certain timer
expires, a multicast router may update the desired or undesired
source lists, reset related timer values, change filter mode, or
trigger group queries. With all of the above factors correlating
with each other, the determination rules become relatively complex,
as the interface states could be frequently changed.
The multicast filter-mode improves the ability of the multicast
receiver to express its desires. It is useful to support Source-
Specific Multicast (SSM) [7] by specifying interesting source
addresses with INCLUDE mode. However, practical applications do not
use EXCLUDE mode to block sources very often, because a user or
application usually wants to specify desired source addresses, not
undesired source addresses. Even if a user wants to explicitly
refuse traffic from some sources in a group, when other users in the
same shared network have an interest in these sources, the
corresponding multicast traffic is forwarded to the network. It is
generally unnecessary to support the filtering function that blocks
sources.
This document proposes simplified versions of IGMPv3 and MLDv2, named
Lightweight IGMPv3 and Lightweight MLDv2 (or LW-IGMPv3 and LW-MLDv2).
LW-IGMPv3 and LW-MLDv2 are subsets of the standard IGMPv3 and MLDv2.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
These protocols support both ASM and SSM communications without a
filtering function that blocks sources. Not only are they compatible
with the standard IGMPv3 and MLDv2, but also the protocol operations
made by hosts and routers or switches (performing IGMPv3/MLDv2
snooping) are simplified to reduce the complicated operations. Since
LW-IGMPv3 and LW-MLDv2 are fully compatible with IGMPv3 and MLDv2,
hosts or routers that have implemented the full version do not need
to implement or modify anything to cooperate with LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2
hosts or routers.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT","SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED","MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].
In addition, the following terms are used in this document.
(*,G) join:
An operation triggered by a host that wants to join the group G. In
this case, the host receives from all sources sending to group G.
This is typical in the ASM communication.
(S,G) join:
An operation triggered by a host that wants to join the group G, with
specifying desired source S. In this case, the host receives only
from source S sending to group G.
INCLUDE (S,G) join:
An operation triggered by a host that wants to join a group G under
INCLUDE filter-mode, with specifying desired source S. The same
meaning of (S,G) join.
EXCLUDE (*,G) join:
An operation triggered by a host that wants to join a group G under
EXCLUDE filter-mode. The same meaning of (*,G) join.
EXCLUDE (S,G) join:
An operation triggered by a host that wants to join a group G under
EXCLUDE filter-mode, with specifying undesired source S. This
operation is not supported by LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
3. Simplification Method Overview
The principle is to simplify the host and router's behavior as much
as possible to improve efficiency, while guaranteeing
interoperability with the full versions, and introducing no side
effects on applications.
For convenience, this document mainly discusses IGMPv3, since MLDv2
inherits the same source filtering mechanism, but this document
additionally shows MLDv2's unique specifications when needed.
3.1. Behavior of Group Members
In LW-IGMPv3, the same service interface model as that of IGMPv3 is
inherited:
IPMulticastListen ( socket, interface, multicast-address,
filter-mode, source-list )
In the lightweight protocol, INCLUDE mode on the host part has the
same usage with the full version for INCLUDE (S,G) join, while
EXCLUDE mode on the host part is preserved only for excluding null
source-lists, which denotes a (*,G) join as used by IGMPv2/IGMPv1/
MLDv1. The detailed host operation of LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 is
described in Section 4.
3.2. Behavior of Multicast Routers
In IGMPv3, router filter-mode is defined to optimize the state
description of a group membership [2][3]. As a rule, once a member
report is in EXCLUDE mode, the router filter-mode for the group will
be set to EXCLUDE. When all systems cease sending EXCLUDE mode
reports, the filter-mode for that group may transit back to INCLUDE
mode. Group timer is used to identify such transition.
In LW-IGMPv3, hosts primarily send INCLUDE requests, and also can
request an EXCLUDE (*,G) join, which can be interpreted by the router
as a request to include all sources. Without the more general form
of EXCLUDE requests, it is unnecessary for the router to maintain the
EXCLUDE filter-mode, and the state model for multicast router can be
simplified as:
(multicast address, group timer, (source records))
Here a group timer is kept to represent a (*,G) join. Its basic
behavior is: when a router receives a (*,G) join, it will set its
group timer and keep the source list for sources specified in the
previously received source records. When the group timer expires,
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
the router may change to the reception for the listed sources. The
definition of the source record is the same as that of full version.
The elimination of the filter-mode will greatly simplify the router
behavior. The detailed operation of router operation is described in
Section 5.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
4. LW-IGMPv3 Protocol for Group Members
4.1. Query and Report Messages
LW-IGMPv3 uses two sets of messages, i.e., Query and Report messages,
being the same as the full version protocols. There is no difference
between the definition and usage of the Query message. But the
report types in lightweight protocols are reduced because an
operation that triggers EXCLUDE (S,G) join is omitted.
There are three Group Record Types defined in the full IGMPv3:
Current-State Record noted by MODE_IS_INCLUDE (referred to as IS_IN)
or MODE_IS_EXCLUDE (IS_EX), Filter-Mode-Change Record noted by
CHANGE_TO_INCLUDE_MODE (TO_IN) or CHANGE_TO_EXCLUDE_MODE (TO_EX), and
Source-List-Change Record noted by ALLOW_NEW_SOURCES (ALLOW) or
BLOCK_OLD_SOURCES (BLOCK). LW-IGMPv3 inherits the action on change
of interface state and reception of a Query, but IS_IN and IS_EX
record types are eliminated and Current-State Records are noted by
other records. The following sections explain the details.
4.2. Action on Change of Interface State
When the state of an interface of a group member host is changed, a
State-Change Report for that interface is immediately transmitted
from that interface. The type and contents of the Group Record(s) in
that Report are determined by comparing the filter mode and source
list for the affected multicast address before and after the change.
While the requirements are the same as the full version for the
computation, in the lightweight version host, the interface state
change rules are simplified due to the reduction of message types.
The contents of the new transmitted report are calculated as follows
(Group Record Types are described in Section 4.4):
Old State New State State-Change Record Sent
----------- ----------- ------------------------
INCLUDE (A) INCLUDE (B) ALLOW(B-A), BLOCK(A-B)
INCLUDE (A) EXCLUDE ({}) TO_EX({})
INCLUDE ({}) EXCLUDE ({}) TO_EX({})
EXCLUDE ({}) INCLUDE (B) TO_IN(B)
As in the full version, to cover the possibility of the State-Change
Report being missed by one or more multicast routers, it is
retransmitted [Robustness Variable]-1 more times, at intervals chosen
at random from the range (0, [Unsolicited Report Interval]). (These
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
values are defined in [2][3].)
4.3. Action on Reception of a Query
As in the full version, when a lightweight version host receives a
Query, it does not respond immediately. Instead, it delays its
response by a random amount of time, bounded by the Max Resp Time
value derived from the Max Resp Code in the received Query message
[2][3]. The system may receive a variety of Queries on different
interfaces and of different kinds (e.g., General Queries, Group-
Specific Queries, and Group-and-Source-Specific Queries), each of
which may require its own delayed response.
Before scheduling a response to a Query, the system must first
consider previously scheduled pending responses and in many cases
schedule a combined response. Therefore, the lightweight version
host must be able to maintain the following state:
o A timer per interface for scheduling responses to General Queries.
o A per-group and interface timer for scheduling responses to Group-
Specific and Group-and-Source-Specific Queries.
o A per-group and interface list of sources to be reported in the
response to a Group-and-Source-Specific Query.
LW-IGMPv3 inherits the full version's rules that are used to
determine if a Report needs to be scheduled. The difference is
regarding the simplification of EXCLUDE filter-mode and the type of
Report as detailed in Section 4.4.
4.4. LW-IGMPv3 Group Record Types
Among Group Record Types defined in the full IGMPv3, several record
types are not used in LW-IGMPv3 as some of the processes related to
the filter mode change to the EXCLUDE mode are eliminated and some of
the report messages are converged with a record having null source
address list. All of the record types of report messages used by the
full and lightweight version protocols are shown as follows:
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
IGMPv3 LW-IGMPv3 Comments
--------- --------- -------------------------------------
IS_EX({}) TO_EX({}) Query response for (*,G) join
IS_EX(x) N/A Query response for EXCLUDE (x,G) join
IS_IN(x) ALLOW(x) Query response for INCLUDE (x,G) join
ALLOW(x) ALLOW(x) INCLUDE (x,G) join
BLOCK(x) BLOCK(x) INCLUDE (x,G) leave
TO_IN(x) TO_IN(x) Change to INCLUDE (x,G) join
TO_IN({}) TO_IN({}) (*,G) leave
TO_EX(x) N/A Change to EXCLUDE (x,G) join
TO_EX({}) TO_EX({}) (*,G) join
where "x" represents a non-null source address list and "({})"
represents null source address list. For instance, IS_EX({}) means a
report whose record type is IS_EX with null source address list.
"N/A" represents not applicable (or no use) because the corresponding
operation should not occur in the lightweight version protocols.
LW-IGMPv3 does not use EXCLUDE filter-mode with a non-null source
address list. A multicast router creates the same state when it
receives a report message containing either IS_EX({}) or TO_EX({})
record types. Therefore, LW-IGMPv3 integrates the IS_EX({})
operation with the TO_EX({}) operation.
When a LW-IGMPv3 host needs to make a query response for the state of
INCLUDE (x,G) join, it makes a response whose message type is
expressed with ALLOW(x), instead of using the IS_IN record type.
Because the router's processing of the two messages is completely
same, the IS_IN(x) type is eliminated for simplification.
A LW-IGMPv3 host does not use EXCLUDE mode, while TO_IN record is
used the following situation: the host first launches an application
(AP1) that requests INCLUDE (x,G) join, and sends ALLOW(x). Then the
host launches another application (AP2) that joins (*,G), and it
sends TO_EX({}). In this condition, when AP2 terminates but AP1
keeps working on the lightweight version host, the host sends a
report with TO_IN(x) record type for [Robustness Variable] times.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
5. LW-IGMPv3 Protocol for Multicast Routers
The major difference between the full and lightweight version
protocols on the router part is that for the lightweight version
filter-mode is discarded and the function of the group timer is
redefined. The states maintained by the lightweight router are
reduced and the protocol operation is greatly simplified.
5.1. Group Timers and Source Timers in the Lightweight Version
In lightweight and full IGMPv3 routers, a source timer is kept for
each source record and it is updated when the source is present in a
received report. It indicates the validity of the sources and needs
to be referred when the router takes its forwarding decision.
The group timer being used in the full version of IGMPv3 for
transitioning the router's filter-mode from EXCLUDE to INCLUDE, is
redefined in the lightweight protocols to identify the non-source-
specific receiving states maintaining for (*,G) join. Once a group
record of TO_EX({}) is received, the group timer is set to represent
this (*,G) group join. The expiration of the group timer indicates
that there are no more listeners on the attached network for this
(*,G) group. Then if at this moment there are unexpired sources
(whose source timers are greater than zero), the router will change
to receiving traffic for those sources. The role of the group timer
can be summarized as follows:
Group Timer Value Actions/Comments
------------------ --------------------------------------
G_Timer > 0 All members in this group.
G_Timer == 0 No more listeners to this (*,G) group.
If all source timers have expired then
delete group record. If there are
still source record timers running,
use those source records with running
timers as the source record state.
The operation related to the group and source timers has some
difference compared with the full IGMPv3. In the full version, if a
source timer expires under the EXCLUDE router filter-mode, its
corresponding source record is not deleted until the group timer
expires for indicating undesired sources. In the lightweight
version, since there is no need to keep such records for blocking
specific sources, if a source timer expires, its source record should
be deleted immediately, not waiting for the time-out of the group
timer.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
5.2. Source-Specific Forwarding Rules
A full version multicast router needs to consult IGMPv3 state
information when it makes decisions on forwarding a datagram from a
source or its upstream router to its attached network, based on the
router filter-mode and source timer. In LW-IGMPv3, because of the
absence of the router filter-mode, the group timer and source timer
could be used for such decisions. The forwarding suggestion made by
LW-IGMPv3 to the routing protocols is summarized as follows:
Group Timer Source Timer Action
------------ ------------------ -----------------------
G_Timer == 0 S_TIMER > 0 Suggest forwarding
traffic from source
G_Timer == 0 S_TIMER == 0 Suggest stopping
forwarding traffic from
source and remove
source record. If there
are no more source
records for the group,
delete group record
G_Timer == 0 No Source Elements Suggest not to forward
traffic from the source
G_Timer > 0 S_TIMER >= 0 Suggest forwarding
traffic from source
G_Timer > 0 No Source Elements Suggest forwarding
traffic from source
5.3. Reception of Current-State Records
When receiving Current-State Records, the LW-IGMPv3 router resets its
group or source timers and updates its source list within the group.
For source-specific group reception state (when G_Timer==0 and
S_Timer > 0), the source list contains sources whose traffic will be
forwarded by the router, while in non-source-specific group reception
(when G_Timer>0), the source list remembers the valid sources to
receive traffic from after toggling to source-specific reception
state.
Although the LW-IGMPv3 host only sends a subset of the message of
that of the full version, the LW-IGMPv3 router should be able to
process as much messages as possible to be compatible with the full
version host. Note that if the report type is IS_EX(x) with non-
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
empty source-list, the router will treat it as the same type of
report with empty source list. The following table describes the
action taken by a multicast router after receiving Current-State
Records. The notations have the same meaning as that in the full
IGMPv3 protocol.
Old New
Source Source
Group Timer List Report Rec'd List Actions
------------ ------ ------------ ------ -----------
G_Timer == 0 A IS_IN(B) A+B (B)=GMI
G_Timer == 0 A IS_EX({}) A G_Timer=GMI
G_Timer > 0 A IS_IN(B) A+B (B)=GMI
G_Timer > 0 A IS_EX({}) A G_Timer=GMI
The above table could be further simplified for the processes that
are completely same for the two values of the G_Timer:
Old New
Source Source
List Report Rec'd List Actions
------ ------------ ------ -----------
A IS_IN(B) A+B (B)=GMI
A IS_EX({}) A G_Timer=GMI
Without EXCLUDE filter-mode, a router's process on receiving Current-
State Record is simple: when a router receives an IS_IN report, it
appends the reported source addresses to the previous source list
with their source timers set to GMI. Upon receiving an IS_EX({})
report, the router sets the non-source-specific receiving states by
resetting the group timer value and keeps the previous source list
without modification.
5.4. Reception of Source-List-Change and Filter-Mode-Change Records
On receiving Source-List-Change and Filter-Mode-Change Records, the
LW-IGMPv3 router needs to reset its group and source timers, update
its source list within the group, or trigger group queries. The
queries are sent by the router for the sources that are requested to
be no longer forwarded to a group. Note that if the report type is
TO_EX(x) with non-empty source-list, the router will treat it as the
same type of report with empty source list. The table below
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
describes the state change and the actions that should be taken.
Old New
Source Source
Group Timer List Report Rec'd List Actions
------------ ------ ------------ ------ -------------
G_Timer == 0 A ALLOW(B) A+B (B)=GMI
G_Timer == 0 A BLOCK(B) A Send Q(G,A*B)
G_Timer == 0 A TO_IN(B) A+B (B)=GMI
Send Q(G,A-B)
G_Timer == 0 A TO_EX({}) A G_Timer=GMI
G_Timer > 0 A ALLOW(B) A+B (B)=GMI
G_Timer > 0 A BLOCK(B) A Send Q(G,A*B)
G_Timer > 0 A TO_IN(B) A+B (B)=GMI
SendQ(G,A-B)
Send Q(G)
G_Timer > 0 A TO_EX({}) A G_Timer=GMI
The table could be further simplified by merging duplicate lines:
Old New
Source Source
List Report Rec'd List Actions
------ ------------ ------ ----------------------
A ALLOW(B) A+B (B)=GMI
A BLOCK(B) A Send Q(G,A*B)
A TO_IN(B) A+B (B)=GMI
Send Q(G,A-B)
If G_Timer>0 Send Q(G)
A TO_EX({}) A G_Timer=GMI
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
6. Interoperability
LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 hosts and routers must interoperate with hosts and
routers of the full version [2][3]. Also, LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 hosts
and routers must interoperate gracefully with hosts and routers
running IGMPv1/v2 or MLDv1.
6.1. Interoperation with the Full Version of IGMPv3/MLDv2
LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 do not introduce any change on the message format
of the group query and report messages the full version protocols
use.
6.1.1. Behavior of Group Members
A LW-IGMPv3 host's compatibility mode is determined from the Host
Compatibility Mode variable which can be in one of three states:
IGMPv1, IGMPv2, or IGMPv3. When a lightweight host behaves on its
interface as LW-IGMPv3, its Host Compatibility Mode of that interface
is set to IGMPv3, and the host sends a subset of IGMPv3 report
messages, which can be recognized by a multicast router running the
full or the lightweight IGMPv3 protocol on the same LAN.
6.1.2. Behavior of Multicast Routers
A LW-IGMPv3 or LW-MLDv2 router does not process directly IS_EX(x) and
TO_EX(x) records that are used by the full version. When a LW-
IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 router receives these report messages from the full
version host, it MUST translate them internally to IS_EX({}) and
TO_EX({}) respectively and behaves accordingly.
6.2. Interoperation with IGMPv1/IGMPv2
Since the lightweight protocols can be treated as the parallel
version of full version of IGMPv3/MLDv2, its compatibility principle
and method with the older version are generally the same as that of
full IGMPv3/MLDv2.
6.2.1. Behavior of Group Members
The Host Compatibility Mode of an interface is set to IGMPv2 and its
IGMPv2 Querier Present timer is set to Older Version Querier Present
Timeout seconds (defined in [2]) whenever an IGMPv2 General Query is
received on that interface. The Host Compatibility Mode of an
interface is set to IGMPv1 and its IGMPv1 Querier Present timer is
set to Older Version Querier Present Timeout seconds whenever an
IGMPv1 Membership Query is received on that interface.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
In the presence of older version group members, LW-IGMPv3 hosts may
allow its report message to be suppressed by either an IGMPv1 or
IGMPv2 membership report. However, because the transmission of
IGMPv1 or v2 packets reduces the capability of the LW-IGMPv3 system,
as a potential protection mechanism, the choice to enable or disable
the use of backward compatibility may be configurable.
6.2.2. Behavior of Multicast Routers
The behavior of a LW-IGMPv3 router when placed on a network where
there are routers that have not been upgraded to IGMPv3, is
completely the same with a full IGMPv3 router in this situation [2].
A full IGMPv3 router uses Group Compatibility Mode (whose value is
either of IGMPv1, IGMPv2, or IGMPv3) per group record to indicate
which version of IGMP protocol it behaves for the group. This value
is set according to the version of the received IGMP report. When
Group Compatibility Mode is IGMPv3, the lightweight router acts with
LW-IGMPv3 protocol for that group.
When Group Compatibility mode is IGMPv2, a LW-IGMPv3 router inherits
this compatibility mechanism with the following rules:
IGMP Message LW-IGMPv3 Equivalent
-------------- --------------------
v2 Report TO_EX({})
v2 Leave TO_IN({})
When Group Compatibility mode is IGMPv1, a LW-IGMPv3 router
internally translates the following IGMPv1 and IGMPv2 messages for
that group to their LW-IGMPv3 equivalents:
IGMP Message LW-IGMPv3 Equivalent
-------------- --------------------
v1 Report TO_EX({})
v2 Report TO_EX({})
6.3. Interoperation with MLDv1
LW-MLDv2 hosts and routers MUST interoperate with the hosts and
routers running MLDv1. The method is the same as described in
Section 6.2. The difference is that when a LW-MLDv2 router has a
MLDv1 listener on its network, it translates the following MLDv1
messages to their LW-MLDv2 equivalents:
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
MLDv1 Message LW-MLDv2 Equivalent
------------- -------------------
Report TO_EX({})
Done TO_IN({})
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
7. Implementation Considerations
The lightweight protocols require no additional procedure on the
implementation of the related protocols or systems, e.g. IGMP/MLD
snooping, multicast routing protocol, and operation of application
sockets, while the processing loads on the switches and routers that
running IGMPv3/MLDv2 (snooping) and multicast routing protocols may
be greatly decreased.
In the following sections, the implementation related aspects are
described for the lightweight version protocols.
7.1. Implementation of Source-Specific Multicast
[8] illustrates the requirements of implementation of Source-Specific
Multicast (SSM) on IGMPv3/MLDv2 hosts and routers. The lightweight
protocol follows the same rule given in [8] except the changing of
the message types due to the simplification.
A LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 host should not invoke (*,G) join (i.e.,
TO_EX({})) and (*,G) leave (i.e., TO_IN({})) for the application
whose multicast address is in the SSM address range. The upstream
LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2 router will ignore the these messages and may log
an error on reception of them. Other types of messages should be
processed as [8] describes.
7.2. Implementation of Multicast Source Filter (MSF) APIs
Multicast Source Filter (MSF) APIs [9] defines (1) IPv4 Basic MSF
API, (2) IPv4 Advanced MSF API, (3) Protocol-Independent Basic MSF
API, and (4) Protocol-Independent Advanced MSF API.
According to the MSF APIs definition, a LW-IGMPv3 host should
implement either IPv4 Basic MSF API or Protocol-Independent Basic MSF
API, and a LW-MLDv2 host should implement Protocol-Independent Basic
MSF API. Other APIs, IPv4 Advanced MSF API and Protocol-Independent
Advanced MSF API, are optional to implement in a LW-IGMPv3/LW-MLDv2
host.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
8. Security Considerations
The security considerations are the same as that of the full version
of IGMPv3/MLDv2.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
9. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to appreciate MBONED and MAGMA working group
members. Special thanks is given to Marshall Eubanks, Guo Feng, Mark
Fine, Prashant Jhingran, Bharat Joshi, Guo Tao, Wang Wendong, and
Gong Xiangyang for their valuable comments and suggestions on this
document.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to indicate requirement
levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.
[2] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 3",
RFC 3376, October 2002.
[3] Vida, R. and L. Costa, "Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2
(MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, June 2004.
[4] Deering, S., "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting", RFC 1112,
August 1989.
[5] Fenner, W., "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2",
RFC 2236, November 1997.
[6] Deering, S., Fenner, W., and B. Haberman, "Multicast Listener
Discovery (MLD) for IPv6", RFC 2710, October 1999.
[7] Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for IP",
RFC 4607, August 2006.
[8] Holbrook, H., Cain, B., and B. Haberman, "Using Internet Group
Management Protocol Version 3 (IGMPv3) and Multicast Listener
Discovery Protocol Version 2 (MLDv2) for Source-Specific
Multicast", RFC 4604, August 2006.
10.2. Informative References
[9] Thaler, D., Fenner, B., and B. Quinn, "Socket Interface
Extensions for Multicast Source Filters", RFC 3678,
January 2004.
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 October 2009
Authors' Addresses
Hui Liu
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Huawei Bld., No.3 Xinxi Rd.
Shang-Di Information Industry Base
Hai-Dian Distinct, Beijing 100085
China
Email: Liuhui47967@huawei.com
Wei Cao
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Huawei Bld., No.3 Xinxi Rd.
Shang-Di Information Industry Base
Hai-Dian Distinct, Beijing 100085
China
Email: caowayne@huawei.com
Hitoshi Asaeda
Keio University
Graduate School of Media and Governance
5322 Endo
Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
Japan
Email: asaeda@wide.ad.jp
Liu, et al. Expires April 17, 2010 [Page 23]