Multicast Addresses for Documentation
draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-04
Yes
(Ron Bonica)
No Objection
(Barry Leiba)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -03)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-17)
Unknown
I think it is a shame that the useful explanatory text is proposed for deletion from the IANA section. It would be nice to convert this into something that will record the motivation.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-07 for -03)
Unknown
I would propose one text improvement: OLD: GLOP [RFC3180] is a method for deriving IPv4 multicast group addresses from 16 bit AS numbers. NEW: GLOP [RFC3180] can be used by anyone who owns a registered AS number to derive 256 global multicast addresses, by mapping the AS number in the middle 16 bits of the IPv4 multicast address 233/8.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-24)
Unknown
I've cleared my DISCUSS. Thanks for addressing these issues.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-09 for -03)
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-05-10 for -03)
Unknown
"The use of specific multicast addresses for documentation purposes has no impact on security." Actually isn't it a security improvement?
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown