Multicast Addresses for Documentation
draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-06-11
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2012-06-11
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress |
2012-06-08
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2012-06-08
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2012-06-08
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from RFC-Ed-Ack |
2012-06-08
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from In Progress |
2012-05-30
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2012-05-29
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2012-05-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2012-05-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2012-05-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2012-05-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2012-05-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup was changed |
2012-05-28
|
04 | Ron Bonica | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup |
2012-05-24
|
04 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
2012-05-24
|
04 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot comment] I've cleared my DISCUSS. Thanks for addressing these issues. |
2012-05-24
|
04 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
2012-05-17
|
04 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot discuss] Thank you for the update. I believe this addresses my Discuss, but I will hold for IANA. |
2012-05-17
|
04 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] I think it is a shame that the useful explanatory text is proposed for deletion from the IANA section. It would be nice … [Ballot comment] I think it is a shame that the useful explanatory text is proposed for deletion from the IANA section. It would be nice to convert this into something that will record the motivation. |
2012-05-17
|
04 | Adrian Farrel | Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Adrian Farrel |
2012-05-17
|
04 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2012-05-17
|
04 | Stig Venaas | New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-04.txt |
2012-05-10
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation |
2012-05-10
|
03 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot comment] "The use of specific multicast addresses for documentation purposes has no impact on security." Actually isn't it a security improvement? |
2012-05-10
|
03 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2012-05-10
|
03 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2012-05-09
|
03 | Wesley Eddy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy |
2012-05-09
|
03 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
2012-05-09
|
03 | Pete Resnick | |
2012-05-09
|
03 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2012-05-09
|
03 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2012-05-09
|
03 | Ron Bonica | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2012-05-08
|
03 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2012-05-08
|
03 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2012-05-07
|
03 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
2012-05-07
|
03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] I would propose one text improvement: OLD: GLOP [RFC3180] is a method for deriving IPv4 multicast group addresses from … [Ballot comment] I would propose one text improvement: OLD: GLOP [RFC3180] is a method for deriving IPv4 multicast group addresses from 16 bit AS numbers. NEW: GLOP [RFC3180] can be used by anyone who owns a registered AS number to derive 256 global multicast addresses, by mapping the AS number in the middle 16 bits of the IPv4 multicast address 233/8. |
2012-05-07
|
03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2012-05-06
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
2012-05-03
|
03 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot discuss] The authors have agreed to update the IANA section following the Routing Directorate review by Geoff Huston and email exchanges with IANA. This … [Ballot discuss] The authors have agreed to update the IANA section following the Routing Directorate review by Geoff Huston and email exchanges with IANA. This Discuss holds the document until that update has been done. |
2012-05-03
|
03 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2012-05-02
|
03 | Pearl Liang | IANA has a question about the IANA Actions requested in this document. Upon approval, IANA understands that there are two IANA actions which must be … IANA has a question about the IANA Actions requested in this document. Upon approval, IANA understands that there are two IANA actions which must be completed. First, the draft requests that IANA assign a scope relative IPv4 address for documentation purposes. IANA proposes 233.252.0.0/24 for this purpose. IANA Question --> does this assignment meet the authors' requirements? Second, the draft requests that IANA assign "variable scope" IPv6 multicast addresses for documentation purposes. IANA proposes FF0X::1:3/96 for this purpose. IANA Question --> does this assignment meet the authors' requirements? IANA understands that these are the only IANA Actions required upon approval of this document. |
2012-05-02
|
03 | (System) | State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
2012-04-30
|
03 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot discuss] I support the publication of this document, but I think there are a few things that should be DISCUSSed. 1. Should IANA reserve … [Ballot discuss] I support the publication of this document, but I think there are a few things that should be DISCUSSed. 1. Should IANA reserve the multicast addresses that are constructed from the unicast prefixes allocated for documentation use? For example, should FF3X:20:2001:DB8::/64 be reserved? 2. Was there any consideration given for how permanent IPv6 multicast addresses could be represented in documentation (i.e., flag T=0)? |
2012-04-30
|
03 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot comment] 1. This draft states that for IPv4, 233.252.0.0/24 is reserved for documentation. The IANA registry lists that range as being assigned to MCAST-TEST-NET. … [Ballot comment] 1. This draft states that for IPv4, 233.252.0.0/24 is reserved for documentation. The IANA registry lists that range as being assigned to MCAST-TEST-NET. Should this description be updated to reflect its new use as a documentation range? 2. It may be useful for the draft to mention why the IPv6 address request to IANA is for a /96. Referencing RFC 3307 and its method of allocating the lowest 32-bits of multicast addresses would be sufficient. |
2012-04-30
|
03 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2012-04-29
|
03 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2012-04-26
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Chris Lonvick. |
2012-04-24
|
03 | Roni Even | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Roni Even. |
2012-04-22
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Chris Lonvick |
2012-04-22
|
03 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Chris Lonvick |
2012-04-21
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-05-10 |
2012-04-21
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Ballot has been issued |
2012-04-21
|
03 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica |
2012-04-21
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Created "Approve" ballot |
2012-04-19
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2012-04-19
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | Last call sent |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested The following Last Call Announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: … State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested The following Last Call Announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Last Call: (Multicast Addresses for Documentation) to Informational RFC The IESG has received a request from the MBONE Deployment WG (mboned) to consider the following document: - 'Multicast Addresses for Documentation' as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-05-02. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document discusses which multicast addresses should be used for documentation purposes and reserves multicast addresses for such use. Some multicast addresses are derived from AS numbers or unicast addresses. This document also explains how these can be used for documentation purposes. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Last call was requested |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | State changed to AD Evaluation from Last Call Requested |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Last call was requested |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Ballot approval text was generated |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Last call announcement was generated |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Last call announcement was generated |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Ballot writeup was changed |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Ballot writeup was changed |
2012-04-18
|
03 | Ron Bonica | Ballot writeup was generated |
2012-04-13
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | Technical Summary It is often useful in documentation, IETF documents, etc., to provide examples containing IP multicast addresses. For documentation where examples of general purpose … Technical Summary It is often useful in documentation, IETF documents, etc., to provide examples containing IP multicast addresses. For documentation where examples of general purpose multicast addresses are needed, one should use multicast addresses that never will be assigned or in actual use. There is a risk that addresses used in examples may accidentally be used. It is then important that the same addresses are not used by other multicast applications or services. It may also be beneficial to filter out such addresses from multicast signalling and multicast data sent to such addresses. For unicast there are both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses reserved for this purpose, see [RFC5737] and [RFC3849] respectively. This document reserves multicast addresses for this purpose. There are also some multicast addresses that are derived from AS numbers or unicast addresses. For examples where such addresses are desired, one should derive them from the AS numbers and unicast addresses reserved for documentation purposes. This document also discusses the use of these. Working Group Summary This draft has received solid support within the working group and no major controversies were noted. Document Quality This document has received several comments from reviewers and the authors addressed each of these comments. Personnel Lenny Giuliano is the Document Shepherd. Ron Bonica is the Responsible Area Director. IANA Note IANA is requested to assign a scope relative IPv4 address for documentation purposes. The string TBD1 in this document should be replaced by the assigned offset. Also the string 255-TBD1 should be replaced by the value of 255 minus the assigned offset. These last two sentences should be deleted before publishing. IANA is requested to assign "variable scope" IPv6 multicast addresses for documentation purposes. This should be a /96 prefix of the form FF0X:... The word TBD2 in this text should be replaced with the assigned prefix, and this sentence should be deleted before publishing. |
2012-04-13
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | Note added 'Lenny Giuliano (lenny@juniper.net) is the document shepherd.' |
2012-04-13
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | Intended Status changed to Informational |
2012-04-13
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2012-02-08
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-03.txt |
2011-10-25
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-02.txt |
2011-07-08
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-01.txt |
2011-05-05
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-00.txt |