Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) Deployment Scenarios
draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-06
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
I resolved my DISCUSS (below) with the promise that it'd get fixed in AUTH48. I think the words "Multicast (ASM) service" are accidentally duplicated at the beginning of the 2nd to last paragraph on page 3 (or I don't understand what the document is trying to say). Other than that I'm a Yes.
(David Kessens; former steering group member) Yes
(Randy Bush; former steering group member) Yes
(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection
Gen-art reviewer Scott Brim: There are a couple tiny things that RFC Editor can clean up, and a couple issues on text clarity, but nothing I can object to. The "clarity" issues are just as much my problem as the draft's. This is deployment scenarios, not a protocol spec, and if you have enough understanding of the protocol to want to deploy it, you will very probably have no problems with text clarity. - Idnits says it's a little off on rfc2026/3667/3668 conformance. - I'm wholeheartedly in favor of the Normative Reference variance for MSDP, and leaving MSDP experimental.
(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
Nit, IANA Considerations: "creates a no new requirements"
(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
The RFC 2119 boilerplate needs to be moved from the Status of this Document into the body of the document. Please place the Acknowledgements section after the IANA Considerations section. In section 6.2: s/SHOULD BE be/SHOULD be/
(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection
(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection
(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
normative ref to ssm architecture, "ID Exists" state. normative ref to mcast-unsuable, "ID Exists" state. Are these documents close to being done?