Media Control Channel Framework (CFW) Call Flow Examples
draft-ietf-mediactrl-call-flows-13
Yes
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
No Objection
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-12)
Unknown
s7.2.1: "mess with" could be better phrased ;)
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-12)
Unknown
- Some of the tools page links seem to be broken by the formatting used, e.g. [1] doesn't go to the security considerations. Not sure if that's easy to fix or worth fixing though. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mediactrl-call-flows-13#section-8 - "variegated bouquet of services": heh, not many RFCs have those:-)
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-12)
Unknown
I am taking a position of no objection based on a quick look which indicated that this text has no impact on Routing.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2013-09-12)
Unknown
I'm intentionally staying with "no position" on this, rather than deferring it, as Richard has assured me that a sufficient number of the right set of eyes have been on it, and as I trust my fellow ADs to have it covered.