Skip to main content

Media Control Channel Framework (CFW) Call Flow Examples
draft-ietf-mediactrl-call-flows-13

Yes

(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)

No Objection

(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)

No Record


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-09-12)
s7.2.1: "mess with" could be better phrased ;)

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-09-12)

- Some of the tools page links seem to be broken by
the formatting used, e.g. [1] doesn't go to the
security considerations. Not sure if that's easy
to fix or worth fixing though.

   [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mediactrl-call-flows-13#section-8

- "variegated bouquet of services": heh, not many RFCs
have those:-)

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-09-12)
I am taking a position of no objection based on a quick look which indicated that this text has no impact on Routing.

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Record

No Record (2013-09-12)
I'm intentionally staying with "no position" on this, rather than deferring it, as Richard has assured me that a sufficient number of the right set of eyes have been on it, and as I trust my fellow ADs to have it covered.