Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings
draft-ietf-mext-binary-ts-05

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

Section 3.1

   The alignment requirement for this sub-option is:

      4n if A, B, C, D, E, or F is set

      2n if G, H, I, or J is set

      n if K, L, M, N is set

Is there a missing "or" in the last line?

If J and K are set, is the alignment 2n or n?

What does it mean to have an alignment requirement of 4n?

---

I agree with Cullen that reviewing this before draft-ietf-mext-flow-
binding seems rash. Isn't it possible that review comments on that other
document might require changes of substance here.

I suggest that the responsible AD should hold a Discuss until the other
document is completed.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Record

Seems like a bad idea to approve this before IESG has even looked at draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding