Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) Bootstrapping for the Integrated Scenario
draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-integrated-dhc-06
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Ward)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-04-29)
Unknown
The introduction says: "In the integrated scenario, the bootstrapping of the home agent information can be achieved via DHCPv6." There is no motivation or reasoning why this is a good thing and whether DHCP is really the right mechanism for this problem. Also, it is not clear from the current text whether this is the only proposed mechanism as DHCP is certainly not used everywhere, especially in the mobile scenario and in the case of ipv6 connectivity bootstrapping.
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-02-06)
Unknown
The security considerations say: > > No additional security considerations are imposed by the > usage of this document. > The security considerations ought to address any concerns that need to be handled by things that are not "imposed" by this document or its normative references. Are there any here? The figures seem to have double captions.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-02-07)
Unknown