Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers over IEEE 802.16e Networks
draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-07
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Lars Eggert)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-02-21)
Unknown
Section 1 2nd paragraph - Should mention that RFC 4260 provides a fast HO solution for IEEE 802.11 networks. - Provide reference for IEEE 802.16. Section 5 Several acronyms from FMIPv6 are used without any introduction, e.g. AR, PAR, FBU, NAR, etc. Section 6 -again many acronyms/message are used without any introduction, e.g. UNA, HI, HACK, etc and others used in the figures -change “..belongs to the different subnet” to “..belongs to a different subnet” Subsection 6.1 -no reference to Figure 3 -for clarification maybe add that msg between L3 and L2 are IEEE 802.21, msg between MN L2 and the BS are IEEE 802.16, and msg between MN L2 and the AR are FMIPv6. Subsection 6.2 -no reference to Figure 4 Section 7 -reference EAP [RFC 3748] and other protection mechanism after updating section (see technical comments)