Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6
draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6-14
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-11-18)
Unknown
4. Proxy-based FMIPv6 Protocol Overview This flag MUST be set in the entire document. Do you mean that this flag needs to be set in any message specified in this document? 6.2.7. IPv4 Address Option As described in Section 4.3, if the MN runs in IPv4-only mode or dual-stack mode, it requires IPv4 home address (IPv4-MN-HoA). This option is used to transfer the IPv4 home address if assigned on the previous link. The format of this option follows the IPv4 Home Address Request Option defined in [IPv4PMIPv6]. Does this need a new allocation from IANA?
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-04-02)
Unknown
I think the document would be cleared if either acronyms or terms for elements like PMAG, NMAG, etc. were used uniformly throughout, rather than a mix of acronyms and terms. I think there are still a few occurrences of "previous access router" and "new access router". While there is text that explains PAR == PMAG and NAR == NMAG, the document would be clearer if PMAG and NMAG were used uniformly throughout. Expand the acronym "CN" and/or define it in the terminology section.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-05-05)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-11-19)
Unknown
In figure 2, I would suggest adding two additional lines in step l to indicate that UL and DL data now flow directly between the NMAG and LMA (i.e., that the PMAG is no longer included the the traffic flow). This is noted already in the text, but seems conspicuous by omission in the figure.