%% You should probably cite rfc5568 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-mipshop-rfc5268bis-01,
    number =    {draft-ietf-mipshop-rfc5268bis-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mipshop-rfc5268bis/01/},
    author =    {Rajeev Koodli},
    title =     {{Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers}},
    pagetotal = 51,
    year =      2009,
    month =     mar,
    day =       4,
    abstract =  {Mobile IPv6 enables a mobile node (MN) to maintain its connectivity to the Internet when moving from one Access Router to another, a process referred to as handover. During handover, there is a period during which the mobile node is unable to send or receive packets because of link-switching delay and IP protocol operations. This "handover latency" resulting from standard Mobile IPv6 procedures (namely, movement detection, new Care-of Address configuration, and Binding Update) is often unacceptable to real-time traffic such as Voice over IP (VoIP). Reducing the handover latency could be beneficial to non-real-time, throughput-sensitive applications as well. This document specifies a protocol to improve handover latency due to Mobile IPv6 procedures. This document does not address improving the link-switching latency. This document updates the packet formats for the Handover Initiate (HI) and Handover Acknowledge (HAck) messages to the Mobility Header Type. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}