The Messaging Layer Security (MLS) Architecture
draft-ietf-mls-architecture-05
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Emad Omara , Benjamin Beurdouche , Eric Rescorla , Srinivas Inguva , Albert Kwon , Alan Duric | ||
Last updated | 2021-01-27 (Latest revision 2020-07-26) | ||
Replaces | draft-omara-mls-architecture | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews |
INTDIR Telechat review
(of
-10)
by Tatuya Jinmei
Ready w/nits
ARTART Last Call review
(of
-10)
by Valery Smyslov
Ready w/issues
GENART Early review
(of
-09)
by Meral Shirazipour
Almost ready
ARTART Last Call Review due 2024-04-08
Incomplete
|
||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Associated WG milestones |
|
||
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | Katriel Cohn-Gordon <me@katriel.co.uk>, Cas Cremers <cas.cremers@cs.ox.ac.uk>, Thyla van der Merwe< thyla.van.der@merwe.tech>, Jon Millican <jmillican@fb.com>, Raphael Robert <raphael@wire.com> |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes the reference architecture, functional and security requirements for the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol. MLS provides a security layer for group messaging applications, where the number of clients ranges from two to many. It is meant to protect against eavesdropping, tampering, and message forgery. Discussion Venues This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture.
Authors
Emad Omara
Benjamin Beurdouche
Eric Rescorla
Srinivas Inguva
Albert Kwon
Alan Duric
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)