SDP: Session Description Protocol
draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-37
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 8866.
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Ali C. Begen , Paul Kyzivat , Colin Perkins , Mark J. Handley | ||
Last updated | 2021-01-19 (Latest revision 2019-08-09) | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
Document shepherd | Flemming Andreasen | ||
Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2018-12-18 | ||
IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 8866 (Proposed Standard) | |
Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | Adam Roach | ||
Send notices to | (None) | ||
IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed | |
IANA action state | RFC-Ed-Ack |
draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-37
Network Working Group A. Begen Internet-Draft Networked Media Obsoletes: 4566 (if approved) P. Kyzivat Intended status: Standards Track Expires: February 10, 2020 C. Perkins University of Glasgow M. Handley UCL August 9, 2019 SDP: Session Description Protocol draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-37 Abstract This memo defines the Session Description Protocol (SDP). SDP is intended for describing multimedia sessions for the purposes of session announcement, session invitation, and other forms of multimedia session initiation. This document obsoletes RFC 4566. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on February 10, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 1] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Glossary of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Examples of SDP Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. Session Initiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. Streaming Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3. Email and the World Wide Web . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.4. Multicast Session Announcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. Requirements and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. Media and Transport Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.2. Timing Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3. Obtaining Further Information about a Session . . . . . . 8 4.4. Internationalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5. SDP Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.1. Protocol Version ("v=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.2. Origin ("o=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.3. Session Name ("s=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.4. Session Information ("i=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.5. URI ("u=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.6. Email Address and Phone Number ("e=" and "p=") . . . . . 14 5.7. Connection Information ("c=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 5.8. Bandwidth Information ("b=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5.9. Time Active ("t=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5.10. Repeat Times ("r=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.11. Time Zone Adjustment ("z=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5.12. Encryption Keys ("k=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.13. Attributes ("a=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.14. Media Descriptions ("m=") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6. SDP Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6.1. cat (category) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 2] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 6.2. keywds (keywords) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6.3. tool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.4. ptime (packet time) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.5. maxptime (maximum packet time) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.6. rtpmap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.7. Media Direction Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.7.1. recvonly (receive-only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 6.7.2. sendrecv (send-receive) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 6.7.3. sendonly (send-only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 6.7.4. inactive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 6.8. orient (orientation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 6.9. type (conference type) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 6.10. charset (character set) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 6.11. sdplang (SDP language) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 6.12. lang (language) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 6.13. framerate (frame rate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 6.14. quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 6.15. fmtp (format parameters) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 8.1. The "application/sdp" Media Type . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 8.2. Registration of SDP Parameters with IANA . . . . . . . . 42 8.2.1. Registration Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 8.2.2. Media Types ("media") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 8.2.3. Transport Protocols ("proto") . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 8.2.4. Attribute Names ("att-field") . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 8.2.5. Bandwidth Specifiers ("bwtype") . . . . . . . . . . . 48 8.2.6. Network Types ("nettype") . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 8.2.7. Address Types ("addrtype") . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 8.3. Encryption Key Access Methods (OBSOLETE) . . . . . . . . 50 9. SDP Grammar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 10. Summary of Changes from RFC 4566 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 1. Introduction When initiating multimedia teleconferences, voice-over-IP calls, streaming video, or other sessions, there is a requirement to convey media details, transport addresses, and other session description metadata to the participants. SDP provides a standard representation for such information, irrespective of how that information is transported. SDP is purely a format for session description -- it does not incorporate a transport Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 3] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 protocol, and it is intended to use different transport protocols as appropriate, including the Session Announcement Protocol (SAP) [RFC2974], Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [RFC3261], Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) [RFC7826], electronic mail [RFC5322] using the MIME extensions [RFC2045], and the Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP) [RFC7230]. SDP is intended to be general purpose so that it can be used in a wide range of network environments and applications. However, it is not intended to support negotiation of session content or media encodings: this is viewed as outside the scope of session description. This memo obsoletes [RFC4566]. The changes relative to [RFC4566] are outlined in Section 10 of this memo. 2. Glossary of Terms The following terms are used in this document and have specific meaning within the context of this document. Session Description: A well-defined format for conveying sufficient information to discover and participate in a multimedia session. Media Description: A Media Description contains the information needed for one party to establish an application layer network protocol connection to another party. It starts with an "m=" line and is terminated by either the next "m=" line or by the end of the session description. Session-level Section: This refers to the parts that are not media descriptions, whereas the session description refers to the whole body that includes the session-level section and the media description(s). The terms "multimedia conference" and "multimedia session" are used in this document as defined in [RFC7656]. The terms "session" and "multimedia session" are used interchangeably in this document. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 4] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 3. Examples of SDP Usage 3.1. Session Initiation The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [RFC3261] is an application- layer control protocol for creating, modifying, and terminating sessions such as Internet multimedia conferences, Internet telephone calls, and multimedia distribution. The SIP messages used to create sessions carry session descriptions that allow participants to agree on a set of compatible media types [RFC6838]. These session descriptions are commonly formatted using SDP. When used with SIP, the offer/answer model [RFC3264] provides a limited framework for negotiation using SDP. 3.2. Streaming Media The Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) [RFC7826], is an application- level protocol for control over the delivery of data with real-time properties. RTSP provides an extensible framework to enable controlled, on-demand delivery of real-time data, such as audio and video. An RTSP client and server negotiate an appropriate set of parameters for media delivery, partially using SDP syntax to describe those parameters. 3.3. Email and the World Wide Web Alternative means of conveying session descriptions include electronic mail and the World Wide Web (WWW). For both email and WWW distribution, the media type "application/sdp" is used. This enables the automatic launching of applications for participation in the session from the WWW client or mail reader in a standard manner. Note that descriptions of multicast sessions sent only via email or the WWW do not have the property that the receiver of a session description can necessarily receive the session because the multicast sessions may be restricted in scope, and access to the WWW server or reception of email is possible outside this scope. 3.4. Multicast Session Announcement In order to assist the advertisement of multicast multimedia conferences and other multicast sessions, and to communicate the relevant session setup information to prospective participants, a distributed session directory may be used. An instance of such a session directory periodically sends packets containing a description of the session to a well-known multicast group. These advertisements are received by other session directories such that potential remote Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 5] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 participants can use the session description to start the tools required to participate in the session. One protocol used to implement such a distributed directory is the SAP [RFC2974]. SDP provides the recommended session description format for such session announcements. 4. Requirements and Recommendations The purpose of SDP is to convey information about media streams in multimedia sessions to allow the recipients of a session description to participate in the session. SDP is primarily intended for use with Internet protocols, although it is sufficiently general that it can describe multimedia conferences in other network environments. Media streams can be many-to-many. Sessions need not be continually active. Thus far, multicast-based sessions on the Internet have differed from many other forms of conferencing in that anyone receiving the traffic can join the session (unless the session traffic is encrypted). In such an environment, SDP serves two primary purposes. It is a means to communicate the existence of a session, and it is a means to convey sufficient information to enable joining and participating in the session. In a unicast environment, only the latter purpose is likely to be relevant. An SDP description includes the following: o Session name and purpose o Time(s) the session is active o The media comprising the session o Information needed to receive those media (addresses, ports, formats, etc.) As resources necessary to participate in a session may be limited, some additional information may also be desirable: o Information about the bandwidth to be used by the session o Contact information for the person responsible for the session In general, SDP must convey sufficient information to enable applications to join a session (with the possible exception of encryption keys) and to announce the resources to be used to any non- participants that may need to know. (This latter feature is Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 6] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 primarily useful when SDP is used with a multicast session announcement protocol.) 4.1. Media and Transport Information An SDP description includes the following media information: o The type of media (video, audio, etc.) o The media transport protocol (RTP/UDP/IP, H.320, etc.) o The format of the media (H.261 video, MPEG video, etc.) In addition to media format and transport protocol, SDP conveys address and port details. For an IP multicast session, these comprise: o The multicast group address for media o The transport port for media This address and port are the destination address and destination port of the multicast stream, whether being sent, received, or both. For unicast IP sessions, the following are conveyed: o The remote address for media o The remote transport port for media The semantics of the address and port depend on context. Typically, this SHOULD be the remote address and remote port to which media is to be sent or received. Details may differ based on the network type, address type, protocol and media specified, and whether the SDP is being distributed as an advertisement or negotiated in an offer/ answer [RFC3264] exchange. (E.g., Some address types or protocols may not have a notion of port.) Deviating from typical behavior should be done cautiously since this complicates implementations (including middleboxes that must parse the addresses to open Network Address Translation (NAT) or firewall pinholes). 4.2. Timing Information Sessions may be either bounded or unbounded in time. Whether or not they are bounded, they may be only active at specific times. SDP can convey: o An arbitrary list of start and stop times bounding the session Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 7] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 o For each bound, repeat times such as "every Wednesday at 10am for one hour" This timing information is globally consistent, irrespective of local time zone or daylight saving time (see Section 5.9). 4.3. Obtaining Further Information about a Session A session description could convey enough information to decide whether or not to participate in a session. SDP may include additional pointers in the form of Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) [RFC3986] for more information about the session. (Note that use of URIs to indicate remote resources is subject to the security considerations from [RFC3986].) 4.4. Internationalization The SDP specification recommends the use of the ISO 10646 character set in the UTF-8 encoding [RFC3629] to allow many different languages to be represented. However, to assist in compact representations, SDP also allows other character sets such as [ISO.8859-1.1998] to be used when desired. Internationalization only applies to free-text sub-fields (session name and background information), and not to SDP as a whole. 5. SDP Specification An SDP description is denoted by the media type "application/sdp" (See Section 8). An SDP description is entirely textual. SDP field names and attribute names use only the US-ASCII subset of UTF-8 [RFC3629], but textual fields and attribute values MAY use the full ISO 10646 character set in UTF-8 encoding, or some other character set defined by the "a=charset:" attribute. Field and attribute values that use the full UTF-8 character set are never directly compared, hence there is no requirement for UTF-8 normalization. The textual form, as opposed to a binary encoding such as ASN.1 or XDR, was chosen to enhance portability, to enable a variety of transports to be used, and to allow flexible, text-based toolkits to be used to generate and process session descriptions. However, since SDP may be used in environments where the maximum permissible size of a session description is limited, the encoding is deliberately compact. Also, since descriptions may be transported via very unreliable means or damaged by an intermediate caching server, the encoding was designed with strict order and formatting rules so that most errors would result in malformed session descriptions that could be detected easily and discarded. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 8] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 An SDP description consists of a number of lines of text of the form: <type>=<value> where <type> is exactly one case-significant character and <value> is structured text whose format depends on <type>. In general, <value> is either a number of sub-fields delimited by a single space character or a free format string, and is case-significant unless a specific field defines otherwise. Whitespace separators are not used on either side of the "=" sign, however, the value can contain a leading whitespace as part of its syntax, i.e., that whitespace is part of the value. An SDP description MUST conform to the syntax defined in Section 9. The following is an overview of the syntax: An SDP description consists of a session-level section followed by zero or more media descriptions. The session-level section starts with a "v=" line and continues to the first media description (or the end of the whole description, whichever comes first). Each media description starts with an "m=" line and continues to the next media description or the end of the whole session description, whichever comes first. In general, session-level values are the default for all media unless overridden by an equivalent media-level value. Some lines in each description are required and some are optional, but when present must appear in exactly the order given here. (The fixed order greatly enhances error detection and allows for a simple parser). In the following overview optional items are marked with a "*". Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 9] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Session description v= (protocol version) o= (originator and session identifier) s= (session name) i=* (session information) u=* (URI of description) e=* (email address) p=* (phone number) c=* (connection information -- not required if included in all media descriptions) b=* (zero or more bandwidth information lines) One or more time descriptions: ("t=", "r=" and "z=" lines; see below) k=* (obsolete) a=* (zero or more session attribute lines) Zero or more media descriptions Time description t= (time the session is active) r=* (zero or more repeat times) z=* (optional time zone offset line) Media description, if present m= (media name and transport address) i=* (media title) c=* (connection information -- optional if included at session level) b=* (zero or more bandwidth information lines) k=* (obsolete) a=* (zero or more media attribute lines) The set of type letters is deliberately small and not intended to be extensible -- an SDP parser MUST completely ignore or reject any session description that contains a type letter that it does not understand. The attribute mechanism ("a=" described below) is the primary means for extending SDP and tailoring it to particular applications or media. Some attributes (the ones listed in Section 6 of this memo) have a defined meaning, but others may be added on a media- or session-specific basis. (Attribute scopes in addition to media-specific and session-specific may also be defined in extensions to this document. E.g., [RFC5576], [I-D.ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg].) An SDP parser MUST ignore any attribute it doesn't understand. An SDP description may contain URIs that reference external content in the "u=", "k=", and "a=" lines. These URIs may be dereferenced in some cases, making the session description non-self-contained. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 10] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 The connection ("c=") information in the session-level section applies to all the media descriptions of that session unless overridden by connection information in the media description. For instance, in the example below, each audio media description behaves as if it were given a "c=IN IP4 198.51.100.1". An example SDP description is: v=0 o=jdoe 3724394400 3724394405 IN IP4 198.51.100.1 s=Call to John Smith i=SDP Offer #1 u=http://www.jdoe.example.com/home.html e=Jane Doe <jane@jdoe.example.com> p=+1 617 555-6011 c=IN IP4 198.51.100.1 t=0 0 m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0 m=audio 49180 RTP/AVP 0 m=video 51372 RTP/AVP 99 c=IN IP6 2001:db8::2 a=rtpmap:99 h263-1998/90000 Text-containing fields such as the session-name-field and information-field are octet strings that may contain any octet with the exceptions of 0x00 (Nul), 0x0a (ASCII newline), and 0x0d (ASCII carriage return). The sequence CRLF (0x0d0a) is used to end a line, although parsers SHOULD be tolerant and also accept lines terminated with a single newline character. If the "a=charset" attribute is not present, these octet strings MUST be interpreted as containing ISO-10646 characters in UTF-8 encoding. When the "a=charset" attribute is present the session-name-field, information-field, and some attribute fields are interpreted according to the selected character set. A session description can contain domain names in the "o=", "u=", "e=", "c=", and "a=" lines. Any domain name used in SDP MUST comply with [RFC1034] and [RFC1035]. Internationalized domain names (IDNs) MUST be represented using the ASCII Compatible Encoding (ACE) form defined in [RFC5890] and MUST NOT be directly represented in UTF-8 or any other encoding (this requirement is for compatibility with [RFC2327] and other early SDP-related standards, which predate the development of internationalized domain names). Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 11] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 5.1. Protocol Version ("v=") v=0 The "v=" line (version-field) gives the version of the Session Description Protocol. This memo defines version 0. There is no minor version number. 5.2. Origin ("o=") o=<username> <sess-id> <sess-version> <nettype> <addrtype> <unicast-address> The "o=" line (origin-field) gives the originator of the session (her username and the address of the user's host) plus a session identifier and version number: <username> is the user's login on the originating host, or it is "-" if the originating host does not support the concept of user IDs. The <username> MUST NOT contain spaces. <sess-id> is a numeric string such that the tuple of <username>, <sess-id>, <nettype>, <addrtype>, and <unicast-address> forms a globally unique identifier for the session. The method of <sess- id> allocation is up to the creating tool, but a timestamp, in seconds since January 1, 1900 UTC, is recommended to ensure uniqueness. <sess-version> is a version number for this session description. Its usage is up to the creating tool, so long as <sess-version> is increased when a modification is made to the session description. Again, as with <sess-id> it is RECOMMENDED that a timestamp be used. <nettype> is a text string giving the type of network. Initially "IN" is defined to have the meaning "Internet", but other values MAY be registered in the future (see Section 8). <addrtype> is a text string giving the type of the address that follows. Initially "IP4" and "IP6" are defined, but other values MAY be registered in the future (see Section 8). <unicast-address> is an address of the machine from which the session was created. For an address type of IP4, this is either a fully qualified domain name of the machine or the dotted-decimal representation of an IP version 4 address of the machine. For an address type of IP6, this is either a fully qualified domain name of the machine or the address of the machine represented as Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 12] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 specified in Section 4 of [RFC5952]. For both IP4 and IP6, the fully qualified domain name is the form that SHOULD be given unless this is unavailable, in which case a globally unique address MAY be substituted. In general, the "o=" line serves as a globally unique identifier for this version of the session description, and the sub-fields excepting the version, taken together identify the session irrespective of any modifications. For privacy reasons, it is sometimes desirable to obfuscate the username and IP address of the session originator. If this is a concern, an arbitrary <username> and private <unicast-address> MAY be chosen to populate the "o=" line, provided that these are selected in a manner that does not affect the global uniqueness of the field. 5.3. Session Name ("s=") s=<session name> The "s=" line (session-name-field) is the textual session name. There MUST be one and only one "s=" line per session description. The "s=" line MUST NOT be empty. If a session has no meaningful name, then "s= " or "s=-" (i.e., a single space or dash as the session name) is RECOMMENDED. If a session-level "a=charset" attribute is present, it specifies the character set used in the "s=" field. If a session-level "a=charset" attribute is not present, the "s=" field MUST contain ISO 10646 characters in UTF-8 encoding. 5.4. Session Information ("i=") i=<session information> The "i=" line (information-field) provides textual information about the session. There can be at most one session-level "i=" line per session description, and at most one "i=" line in each media description. Unless a media-level "i=" line is provided, the session-level "i=" line applies to that media description. If the "a=charset" attribute is present, it specifies the character set used in the "i=" line. If the "a=charset" attribute is not present, the "i=" line MUST contain ISO 10646 characters in UTF-8 encoding. At most one "i=" line can be used for each media description. In media definitions, "i=" lines are primarily intended for labelling media streams. As such, they are most likely to be useful when a single session has more than one distinct media stream of the same media type. An example would be two different whiteboards, one for slides and one for feedback and questions. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 13] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 The "i=" line is intended to provide a free-form human-readable description of the session or the purpose of a media stream. It is not suitable for parsing by automata. 5.5. URI ("u=") u=<uri> The "u=" line (uri-field) provides a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) [RFC3986]. The URI should be a pointer to additional human readable information about the session. This line is OPTIONAL. No more than one "u=" line is allowed per session description. 5.6. Email Address and Phone Number ("e=" and "p=") e=<email-address> p=<phone-number> The "e=" line (email-field) and "p=" line (phone-field) specify contact information for the person responsible for the session. This is not necessarily the same person that created the session description. Inclusion of an email address or phone number is OPTIONAL. If an email address or phone number is present, it MUST be specified before the first media description. More than one email or phone line can be given for a session description. Phone numbers SHOULD be given in the form of an international public telecommunication number (see ITU-T Recommendation E.164 [E164]) preceded by a "+". Spaces and hyphens may be used to split up a phone-field to aid readability if desired. For example: p=+1 617 555-6011 Both email addresses and phone numbers can have an OPTIONAL free text string associated with them, normally giving the name of the person who may be contacted. This MUST be enclosed in parentheses if it is present. For example: e=j.doe@example.com (Jane Doe) The alternative [RFC5322] name quoting convention is also allowed for both email addresses and phone numbers. For example: e=Jane Doe <j.doe@example.com> Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 14] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 The free text string SHOULD be in the ISO-10646 character set with UTF-8 encoding, or alternatively in ISO-8859-1 or other encodings if the appropriate session-level "a=charset" attribute is set. 5.7. Connection Information ("c=") c=<nettype> <addrtype> <connection-address> The "c=" line (connection-field) contains information necessary to establish a network connection. A session description MUST contain either at least one "c=" line in each media description or a single "c=" line at the session level. It MAY contain a single session-level "c=" line and additional media- level "c=" line(s) per-media-description, in which case the media- level values override the session-level settings for the respective media. The first sub-field ("<nettype>") is the network type, which is a text string giving the type of network. Initially, "IN" is defined to have the meaning "Internet", but other values MAY be registered in the future (see Section 8). The second sub-field ("<addrtype>") is the address type. This allows SDP to be used for sessions that are not IP based. This memo only defines IP4 and IP6, but other values MAY be registered in the future (see Section 8). The third sub-field ("<connection-address>") is the connection address. Additional sub-fields MAY be added after the connection address depending on the value of the <addrtype> sub-field. When the <addrtype> is IP4 or IP6, the connection address is defined as follows: o If the session is multicast, the connection address will be an IP multicast group address. If the session is not multicast, then the connection address contains the unicast IP address of the expected data source, data relay or data sink as determined by additional attribute-fields. It is not expected that unicast addresses will be given in a session description that is communicated by a multicast announcement, though this is not prohibited. o Sessions using an IP4 multicast connection address MUST also have a time to live (TTL) value present in addition to the multicast address. The TTL and the address together define the scope with which multicast packets sent in this session will be sent. TTL Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 15] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 values MUST be in the range 0-255. Although the TTL MUST be specified, its use to scope multicast traffic is deprecated; applications SHOULD use an administratively scoped address instead. The TTL for the session is appended to the address using a slash as a separator. An example is: c=IN IP4 233.252.0.1/127 IP6 multicast does not use TTL scoping, and hence the TTL value MUST NOT be present for IP6 multicast. It is expected that IPv6 scoped addresses will be used to limit the scope of multimedia conferences. Hierarchical or layered encoding schemes are data streams where the encoding from a single media source is split into a number of layers. The receiver can choose the desired quality (and hence bandwidth) by only subscribing to a subset of these layers. Such layered encodings are normally transmitted in multiple multicast groups to allow multicast pruning. This technique keeps unwanted traffic from sites only requiring certain levels of the hierarchy. For applications requiring multiple multicast groups, we allow the following notation to be used for the connection address: <base multicast address>[/<ttl>]/<number of addresses> If the number of addresses is not given, it is assumed to be one. Multicast addresses so assigned are contiguously allocated above the base address, so that, for example: c=IN IP4 233.252.0.1/127/3 would state that addresses 233.252.0.1, 233.252.0.2, and 233.252.0.3 are to be used with a TTL of 127. This is semantically identical to including multiple "c=" lines in a media description: c=IN IP4 233.252.0.1/127 c=IN IP4 233.252.0.2/127 c=IN IP4 233.252.0.3/127 Similarly, an IPv6 example would be: c=IN IP6 ff00::db8:0:101/3 which is semantically equivalent to: Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 16] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 c=IN IP6 ff00::db8:0:101 c=IN IP6 ff00::db8:0:102 c=IN IP6 ff00::db8:0:103 (remembering that the TTL sub-field is not present in IP6 multicast). Multiple addresses or "c=" lines MAY be specified on a per media description basis only if they provide multicast addresses for different layers in a hierarchical or layered encoding scheme. Multiple addresses or "c=" lines MUST NOT be specified at session level. The slash notation for multiple addresses described above MUST NOT be used for IP unicast addresses. 5.8. Bandwidth Information ("b=") b=<bwtype>:<bandwidth> The OPTIONAL "b=" line (bandwidth-field) denotes the proposed bandwidth to be used by the session or media description. The <bwtype> is an alphanumeric modifier giving the meaning of the <bandwidth> figure. Two values are defined in this specification, but other values MAY be registered in the future (see Section 8 and [RFC3556], [RFC3890]): CT If the bandwidth of a session is different from the bandwidth implicit from the scope, a "b=CT:..." line SHOULD be supplied for the session giving the proposed upper limit to the bandwidth used (the "conference total" bandwidth). Similarly, if the bandwidth of bundled media streams [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation] in an "m=" line is different from the implicit value from the scope, a "b=CT:..." line SHOULD be supplied in the media level. The primary purpose of this is to give an approximate idea as to whether two or more sessions (or bundled media streams) can coexist simultaneously. Note that CT gives a total bandwidth figure for all the media at all endpoints. The Mux Category for CT is NORMAL. This is discussed in [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes]. AS The bandwidth is interpreted to be application specific (it will be the application's concept of maximum bandwidth). Normally, this will coincide with what is set on the application's "maximum bandwidth" control if applicable. For RTP-based applications, AS gives the RTP "session bandwidth" as defined in Section 6.2 of [RFC3550]. Note that AS gives a bandwidth figure for a single Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 17] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 media at a single endpoint, although there may be many endpoints sending simultaneously. The Mux Category for AS is SUM. This is discussed in [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes]. [RFC4566] defined an "X-" prefix for <bwtype> names. This was intended for experimental purposes only. For example: b=X-YZ:128 Use of the "X-" prefix is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead new (non "X-" prefix) <bwtype> names SHOULD be defined, and then MUST be registered with IANA in the standard namespace. SDP parsers MUST ignore bandwidth-fields with unknown <bwtype> names. The <bwtype> names MUST be alphanumeric and, although no length limit is given, it is recommended that they be short. The <bandwidth> is interpreted as kilobits per second by default (including the transport and network-layer but not the link-layer overhead). The definition of a new <bwtype> modifier MAY specify that the bandwidth is to be interpreted in some alternative unit (the "CT" and "AS" modifiers defined in this memo use the default units). 5.9. Time Active ("t=") t=<start-time> <stop-time> A "t=" line (time-field) begins a time description that specifies the start and stop times for a session. Multiple time descriptions MAY be used if a session is active at multiple irregularly spaced times; each additional time description specifies additional periods of time for which the session will be active. If the session is active at regular repeat times, a repeat description, begun by an "r=" line (see below) can be included following the time-field -- in which case the time-field specifies the start and stop times of the entire repeat sequence. The following example specifies two active intervals: t=3724394400 3724398000 ; Mon 8-Jan-2018 10:00-11:00 UTC t=3724484400 3724488000 ; Tue 9-Jan-2018 11:00-12:00 UTC The first and second sub-fields of the time-field give the start and stop times, respectively, for the session. These are the decimal representation of time values in seconds since January 1, 1900 UTC. To convert these values to UNIX time (UTC), subtract decimal 2208988800. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 18] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Some time representations will wrap in the year 2036. Because SDP uses an arbitrary length decimal representation, it does not have this issue. Implementations of SDP need to be prepared to handle these larger values. If the <stop-time> is set to zero, then the session is not bounded, though it will not become active until after the <start-time>. If the <start-time> is also zero, the session is regarded as permanent. User interfaces SHOULD strongly discourage the creation of unbounded and permanent sessions as they give no information about when the session is actually going to terminate, and so make scheduling difficult. The general assumption may be made, when displaying unbounded sessions that have not timed out to the user, that an unbounded session will only be active until half an hour from the current time or the session start time, whichever is the later. If behavior other than this is required, an end-time SHOULD be given and modified as appropriate when new information becomes available about when the session should really end. Permanent sessions may be shown to the user as never being active unless there are associated repeat times that state precisely when the session will be active. 5.10. Repeat Times ("r=") r=<repeat interval> <active duration> <offsets from start-time> An"r=" line (repeat-field) specifies repeat times for a session. If needed to express complex schedules, multiple repeat-fields may be included. For example, if a session is active at 10am on Monday and 11am on Tuesday for one hour each week for three months, then the <start-time> in the corresponding "t=" line would be the representation of 10am on the first Monday, the <repeat interval> would be 1 week, the <active duration> would be 1 hour, and the offsets would be zero and 25 hours. The corresponding "t=" line stop time would be the representation of the end of the last session three months later. By default, all sub-fields are in seconds, so the "r=" and "t=" lines might be the following: t=3724394400 3730536000 ; Mon 8-Jan-2018 10:00-11:00 UTC ; Tues 20-Mar-2018 12:00 UTC r=604800 3600 0 90000 ; 1 week, 1 hour, zero, 25 hours To make the description more compact, times may also be given in units of days, hours, or minutes. The syntax for these is a number Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 19] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 immediately followed by a single case-sensitive character. Fractional units are not allowed -- a smaller unit should be used instead. The following unit specification characters are allowed: d - days (86400 seconds) h - hours (3600 seconds) m - minutes (60 seconds) s - seconds (allowed for completeness) Thus, the above repeat-field could also have been written: r=7d 1h 0 25h Monthly and yearly repeats cannot be directly specified with a single SDP repeat time; instead, separate time-descriptions should be used to explicitly list the session times. 5.11. Time Zone Adjustment ("z=") z=<adjustment time> <offset> <adjustment time> <offset> .... A "z=" line (zone-field) is an optional modifier to the repeat-fields it immediately follows. It does not apply to any other fields. To schedule a repeated session that spans a change from daylight saving time to standard time or vice versa, it is necessary to specify offsets from the base time. This is required because different time zones change time at different times of day, different countries change to or from daylight saving time on different dates, and some countries do not have daylight saving time at all. Thus, in order to schedule a session that is at the same time winter and summer, it must be possible to specify unambiguously by whose time zone a session is scheduled. To simplify this task for receivers, we allow the sender to specify the time (represented as seconds since January 1, 1900 UTC) that a time zone adjustment happens and the offset from the time when the session was first scheduled. The "z=" line allows the sender to specify a list of these adjustment times and offsets from the base time. An example might be the following: Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 20] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 t=3724394400 3754123200 ; Mon 8-Jan-2018 10:00 UTC ; Tues 18-Dec-2018 12:00 UTC r=604800 3600 0 90000 ; 1 week, 1 hour, zero, 25 hours z=3730928400 -1h 3749680800 0 ; Sun 25-Mar-2018 1:00 UTC, ; offset 1 hour, ; Sun 28-Oct-2018 2:00 UTC, ; no offset This specifies that at time 3730928400 (Sun 25-Mar-2018 1:00 UTC, the onset of British Summer Time) the time base by which the session's repeat times are calculated is shifted back by 1 hour, and that at time 3749680800 (Sun 28-Oct-2018 2:00 UTC, the end of British Summer Time) the session's original time base is restored. Adjustments are always relative to the specified start time -- they are not cumulative. If a session is likely to last several years, it is expected that the session description will be modified periodically rather than transmit several years' worth of adjustments in one session description. 5.12. Encryption Keys ("k=") k=<method> k=<method>:<encryption key> The "k=" line (key-field) is obsolete and MUST NOT be used. It is included in this document for legacy reasons. One MUST NOT include a "k=" line in an SDP, and MUST discard it if it is received in an SDP. 5.13. Attributes ("a=") a=<attribute> a=<attribute>:<value> Attributes are the primary means for extending SDP. Attributes may be defined to be used as "session-level" attributes, "media-level" attributes, or both. (Attribute scopes in addition to media- and session- level may also be defined in extensions to this document. E.g., [RFC5576], [I-D.ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg].) A media description may contain any number of "a=" lines (attribute- fields) that are media description specific. These are referred to as "media-level" attributes and add information about the media description. Attribute-fields can also be added before the first media description; these "session-level" attributes convey additional information that applies to the session as a whole rather than to individual media descriptions. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 21] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Attribute-fields may be of two forms: o A property attribute is simply of the form "a=<attribute>". These are binary attributes, and the presence of the attribute conveys that the attribute is a property of the session. An example might be "a=recvonly". o A value attribute is of the form "a=<attribute>:<value>". For example, a whiteboard could have the value attribute "a=orient:landscape" Attribute interpretation depends on the media tool being invoked. Thus receivers of session descriptions should be configurable in their interpretation of session descriptions in general and of attributes in particular. Attribute names MUST use the US-ASCII subset of ISO-10646/UTF-8. Attribute values are octet strings, and MAY use any octet value except 0x00 (Nul), 0x0A (LF), and 0x0D (CR). By default, attribute values are to be interpreted as in ISO-10646 character set with UTF-8 encoding. Unlike other text fields, attribute values are NOT normally affected by the "charset" attribute as this would make comparisons against known values problematic. However, when an attribute is defined, it can be defined to be charset dependent, in which case its value should be interpreted in the session charset rather than in ISO-10646. Attributes MUST be registered with IANA (see Section 8). If an attribute is received that is not understood, it MUST be ignored by the receiver. 5.14. Media Descriptions ("m=") m=<media> <port> <proto> <fmt> ... A session description may contain a number of media descriptions. Each media description starts with an "m=" line (media-field) and is terminated by either the next "m=" line or by the end of the session description. A media-field has several sub-fields: <media> is the media type. This document defines the values "audio", "video", "text", "application", and "message". This list is extended by other memos and may be further extended by additional memos registering media types in the future (see Section 8). For example, [RFC6466] defined the "image" media type. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 22] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 <port> is the transport port to which the media stream is sent. The meaning of the transport port depends on the network being used as specified in the relevant "c=" line, and on the transport protocol defined in the <proto> sub-field of the media-field. Other ports used by the media application (such as the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) port [RFC3550]) MAY be derived algorithmically from the base media port or MAY be specified in a separate attribute (for example, "a=rtcp:" as defined in [RFC3605]). If non-contiguous ports are used or if they don't follow the parity rule of even RTP ports and odd RTCP ports, the "a=rtcp:" attribute MUST be used. Applications that are requested to send media to a <port> that is odd and where the "a=rtcp:" is present MUST NOT subtract 1 from the RTP port: that is, they MUST send the RTP to the port indicated in <port> and send the RTCP to the port indicated in the "a=rtcp" attribute. For applications where hierarchically encoded streams are being sent to a unicast address, it may be necessary to specify multiple transport ports. This is done using a similar notation to that used for IP multicast addresses in the "c=" line: m=<media> <port>/<number of ports> <proto> <fmt> ... In such a case, the ports used depend on the transport protocol. For RTP, the default is that only the even-numbered ports are used for data with the corresponding one-higher odd ports used for the RTCP belonging to the RTP session, and the <number of ports> denoting the number of RTP sessions. For example: m=video 49170/2 RTP/AVP 31 would specify that ports 49170 and 49171 form one RTP/RTCP pair and 49172 and 49173 form the second RTP/RTCP pair. RTP/AVP is the transport protocol and 31 is the format (see below). This document does not include a mechanism for declaring hierarchically encoded streams using non-contiguous ports. (There is currently no attribute defined that can accomplish this. The "a=rtcp:" defined in [RFC3605] does not handle hierarchical encoding.) If a need arises to declare non-contiguous ports then it will be necessary to define a new attribute to do so. If multiple addresses are specified in the "c=" line and multiple ports are specified in the "m=" line, a one-to-one mapping from port to the corresponding address is implied. For example: Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 23] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 m=video 49170/2 RTP/AVP 31 c=IN IP4 233.252.0.1/127/2 would imply that address 233.252.0.1 is used with ports 49170 and 49171, and address 233.252.0.2 is used with ports 49172 and 49173. The mapping is similar if multiple addresses are specified using multiple "c=" lines. For example: m=video 49170/2 RTP/AVP 31 c=IN IP6 ff00::db8:0:101 c=IN IP6 ff00::db8:0:102 would imply that address ff00::db8:0:101 is used with ports 49170 and 49171, and address ff00::db8:0:102 is used with ports 49172 and 49173. This document gives no meaning to assigning the same media address to multiple media-descriptions. Doing so does not implicitly group those media-descriptions in any way. An explicit grouping framework (for example, [RFC5888]) should instead be used to express the intended semantics. For instance, see [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation]. <proto> is the transport protocol. The meaning of the transport protocol is dependent on the address type sub-field in the relevant "c=" line. Thus a "c=" line with an address type of IP4 indicates that the transport protocol runs over IPv4. The following transport protocols are defined, but may be extended through registration of new protocols with IANA (see Section 8): * udp: denotes that the data is transported directly in UDP with no additional framing. * RTP/AVP: denotes RTP [RFC3550] used under the RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control [RFC3551] running over UDP. * RTP/SAVP: denotes the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol [RFC3711] running over UDP. The main reason to specify the transport protocol in addition to the media format is that the same standard media formats may be carried over different transport protocols even when the network protocol is the same -- a historical example is VAT (MBone's popular multimedia audio tool) Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) audio and RTP PCM audio; another might be TCP/RTP PCM audio. In Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 24] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 addition, relays and monitoring tools that are transport-protocol- specific but format-independent are possible. <fmt> is a media format description. The fourth and any subsequent sub-fields describe the format of the media. The interpretation of the media format depends on the value of the <proto> sub-field. If the <proto> sub-field is "RTP/AVP" or "RTP/SAVP" the <fmt> sub- fields contain RTP payload type numbers. When a list of payload type numbers is given, this implies that all of these payload formats MAY be used in the session, but the first of these formats SHOULD be used as the default format for the session. For dynamic payload type assignments the "a=rtpmap:" attribute (see Section 6) SHOULD be used to map from an RTP payload type number to a media encoding name that identifies the payload format. The "a=fmtp:" attribute MAY be used to specify format parameters (see Section 6). If the <proto> sub-field is "udp" the <fmt> sub-fields MUST reference a media type describing the format under the "audio", "video", "text", "application", or "message" top-level media types. The media type registration SHOULD define the packet format for use with UDP transport. For media using other transport protocols, the <fmt> sub-field is protocol specific. Rules for interpretation of the <fmt> sub- field MUST be defined when registering new protocols (see Section 8.2.2). Section 3 of [RFC4855] states that the payload format (encoding) names defined in the RTP Profile are commonly shown in upper case, while media subtype names are commonly shown in lower case. It also states that both of these names are case-insensitive in both places, similar to parameter names which are case-insensitive both in media type strings and in the default mapping to the SDP a=fmtp attribute. 6. SDP Attributes The following attributes are defined. Since application writers may add new attributes as they are required, this list is not exhaustive. Registration procedures for new attributes are defined in Section 8.2.4. Syntax is provided using ABNF [RFC7405] with some of the rules defined further in Section 9. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 25] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 6.1. cat (category) Name: cat Value: cat-value Usage Level: session Charset Dependent: no Syntax: cat-value = category category = non-ws-string Example: a=cat:foo.bar This attribute gives the dot-separated hierarchical category of the session. This is to enable a receiver to filter unwanted sessions by category. There is no central registry of categories. This attribute is obsolete and SHOULD NOT be used. It SHOULD be ignored if received. 6.2. keywds (keywords) Name: keywds Value: keywds-value Usage Level: session Charset Dependent: yes Syntax: keywds-value = keywords keywords = text Example: a=keywds:SDP session description protocol Like the cat attribute, this was intended to assist identifying wanted sessions at the receiver. This allows a receiver to select interesting sessions based on keywords describing the purpose of the session; there is no central registry of keywords. Its value should Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 26] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 be interpreted in the charset specified for the session description if one is specified, or by default in ISO 10646/UTF-8. This attribute is obsolete and SHOULD NOT be used. It SHOULD be ignored if received. 6.3. tool Name: tool Value: tool-value Usage Level: session Charset Dependent: no Syntax: tool-value = tool-name-and-version tool-name-and-version = text Example: a=tool:foobar V3.2 This gives the name and version number of the tool used to create the session description. 6.4. ptime (packet time) Name: ptime Value: ptime-value Usage Level: media Charset Dependent: no Syntax: ptime-value = non-zero-int-or-real Example: a=ptime:20 This gives the length of time in milliseconds represented by the media in a packet. This is probably only meaningful for audio data, but may be used with other media types if it makes sense. It should Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 27] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 not be necessary to know ptime to decode RTP or vat audio, and it is intended as a recommendation for the encoding/packetization of audio. 6.5. maxptime (maximum packet time) Name: maxptime Value: maxptime-value Usage Level: media Charset Dependent: no Syntax: maxptime-value = non-zero-int-or-real Example: a=maxptime:20 This gives the maximum amount of media that can be encapsulated in each packet, expressed as time in milliseconds. The time SHALL be calculated as the sum of the time the media present in the packet represents. For frame-based codecs, the time SHOULD be an integer multiple of the frame size. This attribute is probably only meaningful for audio data, but may be used with other media types if it makes sense. Note that this attribute was introduced after [RFC2327], and non-updated implementations will ignore this attribute. 6.6. rtpmap Name: rtpmap Value: rtpmap-value Usage Level: media Charset Dependent: no Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 28] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Syntax: rtpmap-value = payload-type SP encoding-name "/" clock-rate [ "/" encoding-params ] payload-type = zero-based-integer encoding-name = token clock-rate = integer encoding-params = channels channels = integer This attribute maps from an RTP payload type number (as used in an "m=" line) to an encoding name denoting the payload format to be used. It also provides information on the clock rate and encoding parameters. Note that the payload type number is indicated in a 7-bit field, limiting the values to inclusively between 0 and 127. Although an RTP profile can make static assignments of payload type numbers to payload formats, it is more common for that assignment to be done dynamically using "a=rtpmap:" attributes. As an example of a static payload type, consider u-law PCM coded single-channel audio sampled at 8 kHz. This is completely defined in the RTP Audio/Video profile as payload type 0, so there is no need for an "a=rtpmap:" attribute, and the media for such a stream sent to UDP port 49232 can be specified as: m=audio 49232 RTP/AVP 0 An example of a dynamic payload type is 16-bit linear encoded stereo audio sampled at 16 kHz. If we wish to use the dynamic RTP/AVP payload type 98 for this stream, additional information is required to decode it: m=audio 49232 RTP/AVP 98 a=rtpmap:98 L16/16000/2 Up to one rtpmap attribute can be defined for each media format specified. Thus, we might have the following: m=audio 49230 RTP/AVP 96 97 98 a=rtpmap:96 L8/8000 a=rtpmap:97 L16/8000 a=rtpmap:98 L16/11025/2 RTP profiles that specify the use of dynamic payload types MUST define the set of valid encoding names and/or a means to register encoding names if that profile is to be used with SDP. The "RTP/AVP" and "RTP/SAVP" profiles use media subtypes for encoding names, under Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 29] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 the top-level media type denoted in the "m=" line. In the example above, the media types are "audio/L8" and "audio/L16". For audio streams, encoding-params indicates the number of audio channels. This parameter is OPTIONAL and may be omitted if the number of channels is one, provided that no additional parameters are needed. For video streams, no encoding parameters are currently specified. Additional encoding parameters MAY be defined in the future, but codec-specific parameters SHOULD NOT be added. Parameters added to an "a=rtpmap:" attribute SHOULD only be those required for a session directory to make the choice of appropriate media to participate in a session. Codec-specific parameters should be added in other attributes (for example, "a=fmtp:"). Note: RTP audio formats typically do not include information about the number of samples per packet. If a non-default (as defined in the RTP Audio/Video Profile [RFC3551]) packetization is required, the "ptime" attribute is used as given above. 6.7. Media Direction Attributes At most one occurrence of recvonly, sendrecv, sendonly, or inactive MAY appear at session level, and at most one MAY appear in each media description. If any one of these appears in a media description then it applies for that media description. If none appear in a media description then the one from session level, if any, applies to that media description. If none of the media direction attributes is present at either session level or media level, "sendrecv" SHOULD be assumed as the default. Within the following SDP example, the "sendrecv" attribute applies to the first audio media and the "inactive" attribute applies to the others. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 30] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 v=0 o=jdoe 3724395000 3724395001 IN IP6 2001:db8::1 s=- c=IN IP6 2001:db8::1 t=0 0 a=inactive m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0 a=sendrecv m=audio 49180 RTP/AVP 0 m=video 51372 RTP/AVP 99 a=rtpmap:99 h263-1998/90000 6.7.1. recvonly (receive-only) Name: recvonly Value: Usage Level: session, media Charset Dependent: no Example: a=recvonly This specifies that the tools should be started in receive-only mode where applicable. Note that recvonly applies to the media only, not to any associated control protocol. An RTP-based system in recvonly mode MUST still send RTCP packets as described in [RFC3550] Section 6. 6.7.2. sendrecv (send-receive) Name: sendrecv Value: Usage Level: session, media Charset Dependent: no Example: a=sendrecv Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 31] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 This specifies that the tools should be started in send and receive mode. This is necessary for interactive multimedia conferences with tools that default to receive-only mode. 6.7.3. sendonly (send-only) Name: sendonly Value: Usage Level: session, media Charset Dependent: no Example: a=sendonly This specifies that the tools should be started in send-only mode. An example may be where a different unicast address is to be used for a traffic destination than for a traffic source. In such a case, two media descriptions may be used, one sendonly and one recvonly. Note that sendonly applies only to the media, and any associated control protocol (e.g., RTCP) SHOULD still be received and processed as normal. 6.7.4. inactive Name: inactive Value: Usage Level: session, media Charset Dependent: no Example: a=inactive This specifies that the tools should be started in inactive mode. This is necessary for interactive multimedia conferences where users can put other users on hold. No media is sent over an inactive media stream. Note that an RTP-based system MUST still send RTCP (if RTCP is used), even if started inactive. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 32] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 6.8. orient (orientation) Name: orient Value: orient-value Usage Level: media Charset Dependent: no Syntax: orient-value = portrait / landscape / seascape portrait = %s"portrait" landscape = %s"landscape" seascape = %s"seascape" ; NOTE: These names are case-sensitive. Example: a=orient:portrait Normally this is only used for a whiteboard or presentation tool. It specifies the orientation of the workspace on the screen. Permitted values are "portrait", "landscape", and "seascape" (upside-down landscape). 6.9. type (conference type) Name: type Value: type-value Usage Level: session Charset Dependent: no Syntax: type-value = conference-type conference-type = broadcast / meeting / moderated / test / H332 broadcast = %s"broadcast" meeting = %s"meeting" moderated = %s"moderated" test = %s"test" H332 = %s"H332" ; NOTE: These names are case-sensitive. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 33] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Example: a=type:moderated This specifies the type of the multimedia conference. Allowed values are "broadcast", "meeting", "moderated", "test", and "H332". These values have implications for other options that are likely to be appropriate: o When "a=type:broadcast" is specified, "a=recvonly" is probably appropriate for those connecting. o When "a=type:meeting" is specified, "a=sendrecv" is likely to be appropriate. o "a=type:moderated" suggests the use of a floor control tool and that the media tools be started so as to mute new sites joining the multimedia conference. o Specifying "a=type:H332" indicates that this loosely coupled session is part of an H.332 session as defined in the ITU H.332 specification [ITU.H332.1998]. Media tools should be started using "a=recvonly". o Specifying "a=type:test" is suggested as a hint that, unless explicitly requested otherwise, receivers can safely avoid displaying this session description to users. 6.10. charset (character set) Name: charset Value: charset-value Usage Level: session Charset Dependent: no Syntax: charset-value = <defined in [RFC2978]> This specifies the character set to be used to display the session name and information data. By default, the ISO-10646 character set in UTF-8 encoding is used. If a more compact representation is required, other character sets may be used. For example, the ISO 8859-1 is specified with the following SDP attribute: Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 34] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 a=charset:ISO-8859-1 The charset specified MUST be one of those registered in the IANA Character Sets registry (http://www.iana.org/assignments/character- sets), such as ISO-8859-1. The character set identifier is a string that MUST be compared against identifiers from the "Name" or "Preferred MIME Name" field of the registry using a case-insensitive comparison. If the identifier is not recognized or not supported, all strings that are affected by it SHOULD be regarded as octet strings. Charset-dependent fields MUST contain only sequences of bytes that are valid according to the definition of the selected character set. Furthermore, charset-dependent fields MUST NOT contain the bytes 0x00 (Nul), 0x0A (LF), and 0x0d (CR). 6.11. sdplang (SDP language) Name: sdplang Value: sdplang-value Usage Level: session, media Charset Dependent: no Syntax: sdplang-value = Language-Tag ; Language-Tag defined in RFC5646 Example: a=sdplang:fr Multiple sdplang attributes can be provided either at session or media level if the session description or media use multiple languages. As a session-level attribute, it specifies the language for the session description (not the language of the media). As a media- level attribute, it specifies the language for any media-level SDP information-field associated with that media (again not the language of the media), overriding any sdplang attributes specified at session level. In general, sending session descriptions consisting of multiple languages is discouraged. Instead, multiple sesssion descriptions Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 35] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 SHOULD be sent describing the session, one in each language. However, this is not possible with all transport mechanisms, and so multiple sdplang attributes are allowed although NOT RECOMMENDED. The "sdplang" attribute value must be a single [RFC5646] language tag. An "sdplang" attribute SHOULD be specified when a session is distributed with sufficient scope to cross geographic boundaries, where the language of recipients cannot be assumed, or where the session is in a different language from the locally assumed norm. 6.12. lang (language) Name: lang Value: lang-value Usage Level: session, media Charset Dependent: no Syntax: lang-value = Language-Tag ; Language-Tag defined in RFC5646 Example: a=lang:de Multiple lang attributes can be provided either at session or media level if the session or media has capabilities in more than one language, in which case the order of the attributes indicates the order of preference of the various languages in the session or media, from most preferred to least preferred. As a session-level attribute, lang specifies a language capability for the session being described. As a media-level attribute, it specifies a language capability for that media, overriding any session-level language(s) specified. The "lang" attribute value must be a single [RFC5646] language tag. A "lang" attribute SHOULD be specified when a session is of sufficient scope to cross geographic boundaries where the language of participants cannot be assumed, or where the session has capabilities in languages different from the locally assumed norm. The "lang" attribute is supposed to be used for setting the initial language(s) used in the session. Events during the session may Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 36] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 influence which language(s) are used, and the participants are not strictly bound to only use the declared languages. Most real-time use cases start with just one language used, while other cases involve a range of languages, e.g. an interpreted or subtitled session. When more than one 'lang' attribute is specified, the "lang" attribute itself does not provide any information about multiple languages being intended to be used during the session, or if the intention is to only select one of the languages. If needed, a new attribute can be defined and used to indicate such intentions. Without such semantics, it is assumed that for a negotiated session one of the declared languages will be selected and used. 6.13. framerate (frame rate) Name: framerate Value: framerate-value Usage Level: media Charset Dependent: no Syntax: framerate-value = non-zero-int-or-real Example: a=framerate:60 This gives the maximum video frame rate in frames/sec. It is intended as a recommendation for the encoding of video data. Decimal representations of fractional values are allowed. It is defined only for video media. 6.14. quality Name: quality Value: quality-value Usage Level: media Charset Dependent: no Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 37] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Syntax: quality-value = zero-based-integer Example: a=quality:10 This gives a suggestion for the quality of the encoding as an integer value. The intention of the quality attribute for video is to specify a non-default trade-off between frame-rate and still-image quality. For video, the value is in the range 0 to 10, with the following suggested meaning: 10 - the best still-image quality the compression scheme can give. 5 - the default behavior given no quality suggestion. 0 - the worst still-image quality the codec designer thinks is still usable. 6.15. fmtp (format parameters) Name: fmtp Value: fmtp-value Usage Level: media Charset Dependent: no Syntax: fmtp-value = fmt SP format-specific-params format-specific-params = byte-string ; Notes: ; - The format parameters are media type parameters and ; need to reflect their syntax. Example: a=fmtp:96 profile-level-id=42e016;max-mbps=108000;max-fs=3600 This attribute allows parameters that are specific to a particular format to be conveyed in a way that SDP does not have to understand them. The format must be one of the formats specified for the media. Format-specific parameters, semicolon separated, may be any set of parameters required to be conveyed by SDP and given unchanged to the Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 38] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 media tool that will use this format. At most one instance of this attribute is allowed for each format. The fmtp attribute may be used to specify parameters for any protocol and format that defines use of such parameters. 7. Security Considerations SDP is frequently used with the Session Initiation Protocol [RFC3261] using the offer/answer model [RFC3264] to agree on parameters for unicast sessions. When used in this manner, the security considerations of those protocols apply. SDP is a session description format that describes multimedia sessions. Entities receiving and acting upon an SDP message SHOULD be aware that a session description cannot be trusted unless it has been obtained by an authenticated and integrity-protected transport protocol from a known and trusted source. Many different transport protocols may be used to distribute session descriptions, and the nature of the authentication and integrity-protection will differ from transport to transport. For some transports, security features are often not deployed. In case a session description has not been obtained in a trusted manner, the endpoint SHOULD exercise care because, among other attacks, the media sessions received may not be the intended ones, the destination where media is sent to may not be the expected one, any of the parameters of the session may be incorrect, or the media security may be compromised. It is up to the endpoint to make a sensible decision taking into account the security risks of the application and the user preferences - the endpoint may decide to ask the user whether or not to accept the session. On receiving a session description over an unauthenticated transport mechanism or from an untrusted party, software parsing the session description should take a few precautions. Similar concerns apply if integrity protection is not in place. Session descriptions contain information required to start software on the receiver's system. Software that parses a session description MUST NOT be able to start other software except that which is specifically configured as appropriate software to participate in multimedia sessions. It is normally considered inappropriate for software parsing a session description to start, on a user's system, software that is appropriate to participate in multimedia sessions, without the user first being informed that such software will be started and giving the user's consent. Thus, a session description arriving by session announcement, email, session invitation, or WWW page MUST NOT deliver the user into an interactive multimedia session unless the user has explicitly pre-authorized such action. As it is not always simple to tell whether or not a session is interactive, applications that are Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 39] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 unsure should assume sessions are interactive. Software processing URLs contained in session descriptions should also heed the security considerations identified in [RFC3986]. In this specification, there are no attributes that would allow the recipient of a session description to be informed to start multimedia tools in a mode where they default to transmitting. Under some circumstances it might be appropriate to define such attributes. If this is done, an application parsing a session description containing such attributes SHOULD either ignore them or inform the user that joining this session will result in the automatic transmission of multimedia data. The default behavior for an unknown attribute is to ignore it. In certain environments, it has become common for intermediary systems to intercept and analyze session descriptions contained within other signaling protocols. This is done for a range of purposes, including but not limited to opening holes in firewalls to allow media streams to pass, or to mark, prioritize, or block traffic selectively. In some cases, such intermediary systems may modify the session description, for example, to have the contents of the session description match NAT bindings dynamically created. These behaviors are NOT RECOMMENDED unless the session description is conveyed in such a manner that allows the intermediary system to conduct proper checks to establish the authenticity of the session description, and the authority of its source to establish such communication sessions. SDP by itself does not include sufficient information to enable these checks: they depend on the encapsulating protocol (e.g., SIP or RTSP). Use of some procedures and SDP extensions (e.g., ICE [RFC8445] and ICE-SIP-SDP [I-D.ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp]) may avoid the need for intermediaries to modify SDP. SDP MUST NOT be used to convey keying material (e.g., using "a=crypto" [RFC4568]) unless it can be guaranteed that the channel over which the SDP is delivered is both private and authenticated. 8. IANA Considerations 8.1. The "application/sdp" Media Type One media type registration from [RFC4566] is to be updated, as defined below. To: ietf-types@iana.org Subject: Registration of media type "application/sdp" Type name: application Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 40] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Subtype name: sdp Required parameters: None. Optional parameters: None. Encoding considerations: 8-bit text. SDP files are primarily UTF-8 format text. The "a=charset:" attribute may be used to signal the presence of other character sets in certain parts of an SDP file (see Section 6 of RFC XXXX). Arbitrary binary content cannot be directly represented in SDP. Security considerations: See Section 7 of RFC XXXX. Interoperability considerations: See RFC XXXX. Published specification: See RFC XXXX. Applications which use this media type: Voice over IP, video teleconferencing, streaming media, instant messaging, among others. See also Section 3 of RFC XXXX. Fragment identifier considerations: None Additional information: Deprecated alias names for this type: N/A Magic number(s): None. File extension(s): The extension ".sdp" is commonly used. Macintosh File Type Code(s): "sdp " Person & email address to contact for further information: IETF MMUSIC working group <mmusic@ietf.org> Intended usage: COMMON Restrictions on usage: None Author/Change controller: Authors of RFC XXXX IETF MMUSIC working group delegated from the IESG Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 41] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 8.2. Registration of SDP Parameters with IANA This document specifies IANA parameter registries for six named SDP sub-fields. Using the terminology in the SDP specification Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF), they are "media", "proto", "att-field", "bwtype", "nettype", and "addrtype". This document also replaces and updates the definitions of all those parameters previously defined by [RFC4566]. IANA: Please change all references to RFC4566 in these registries to instead refer to this document. The contact name and email address for all parameters registered in this document is: The IETF MMUSIC working group <mmusic@ietf.org> or its successor as designated by the IESG. All of these registries have a common format: ---------------------------------------------------- | Type | SDP Name | [other fields] | Reference | ---------------------------------------------------- 8.2.1. Registration Procedure A specification document that defines values for SDP "media", "proto", "att-field", "bwtype", "nettype", and "addrtype" parameters MUST include the following information: o contact name; o contact email address; o name being defined (as it will appear in SDP); o type of name ("media", "proto", "bwtype", "nettype", or "addrtype"); o a description of the purpose of the defined name; o a stable reference to the document containing this information and the definition of the value. (This will typically be an RFC number.) Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 42] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 The subsections below specify what other information (if any) must be specified for particular parameters, and what other fields are to be included in the registry. 8.2.2. Media Types ("media") The set of media types is intended to be small and SHOULD NOT be extended except under rare circumstances. The same rules should apply for media names as for top-level media types, and where possible the same name should be registered for SDP as for MIME. For media other than existing top-level media types, a Standards Track RFC MUST be produced for a new top-level media type to be registered, and the registration MUST provide good justification why no existing media name is appropriate (the "Standards Action" policy of [RFC8126]). This memo registers the media types "audio", "video", "text", "application", and "message". Note: The media types "control" and "data" were listed as valid in an early version of this specification (RFC 2327); however, their semantics were never fully specified and they are not widely used. These media types have been removed in this specification, although they still remain valid media type capabilities for a SIP user agent as defined in [RFC3840]. If these media types are considered useful in the future, a Standards Track RFC MUST be produced to document their use. Until that is done, applications SHOULD NOT use these types and SHOULD NOT declare support for them in SIP capabilities declarations (even though they exist in the registry created by [RFC3840]). Also note that [RFC6466] defined the "image" media type. 8.2.3. Transport Protocols ("proto") The "proto" sub-field describes the transport protocol used. The registration procedure for this registry is "RFC Required". This document registers two values: o "RTP/AVP" is a reference to [RFC3550] used under the RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control [RFC3551] running over UDP/IP, o "UDP" indicates direct use of the UDP protocol. New transport protocols MAY be defined, and MUST be registered with IANA. Registrations MUST reference an RFC describing the protocol. Such an RFC MAY be Experimental or Informational, although it is preferable that it be Standards Track. The RFC defining a new Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 43] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 protocol MUST define the rules by which the "fmt" (see below) namespace is managed. "proto" names starting with "RTP/" MUST only be used for defining transport protocols that are profiles of the RTP protocol. For example, a profile whose short name is "XYZ" would be denoted by a "proto" sub-field of "RTP/XYZ". Each transport protocol, defined by the "proto" sub-field, has an associated "fmt" namespace that describes the media formats that may be conveyed by that protocol. Formats cover all the possible encodings that could be transported in a multimedia session. RTP payload formats under the "RTP/AVP" and other "RTP/*" profiles MUST use the payload type number as their "fmt" value. If the payload type number is dynamically assigned by this session description, an additional "rtpmap" attribute MUST be included to specify the format name and parameters as defined by the media type registration for the payload format. It is RECOMMENDED that other RTP profiles that are registered (in combination with RTP) as SDP transport protocols specify the same rules for the "fmt" namespace. For the "UDP" protocol, allowed "fmt" values are media subtypes from the IANA Media Types registry. The media type and subtype combination <media>/<fmt> specifies the format of the body of UDP packets. Use of an existing media subtype for the format is encouraged. If no suitable media subtype exists, it is RECOMMENDED that a new one be registered through the IETF process [RFC6838] by production of, or reference to, a standards-track RFC that defines the format. For other protocols, formats MAY be registered according to the rules of the associated "proto" specification. Registrations of new formats MUST specify which transport protocols they apply to. 8.2.4. Attribute Names ("att-field") Attribute-field names ("att-field") MUST be registered with IANA and documented, to avoid any issues due to conflicting attribute definitions under the same name. (While unknown attributes in SDP are simply ignored, conflicting ones that fragment the protocol are a serious problem.) The format of the attribute registry is: Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 44] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | Mux | | | Type | SDP Name | Usage Level | Category | Reference | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For example, the attribute "setup" which is defined for both session and media level, will be listed in the new registry as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | Mux | | | Type | SDP Name | Usage Level | Category | Reference | |----------|------------|----------------|----------|----------------| |attribute |setup | session,media, |IDENTICAL | [RFC4145] | | | | dcsa,dcsa(msrp)| | [RFC6135] | | | | | | [I-D.mmusic- | | | | | | msrp-usage- | | | | | | data-channel] | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This one registry combines all of the previous usage-level-specific "att-field" registries, including updates made by [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes]. IANA is requested to do the necessary reformatting. Section 6 of this document replaces the initial set of attribute definitions made by [RFC4566]. IANA is requested to update the registry accordingly. Documents can define new attributes and can also extend the definitions of previously defined attributes: 8.2.4.1. New Attributes New attribute registrations are accepted according to the "Specification Required" policy of [RFC8126], provided that the specification includes the following information: o Contact Name. o Contact Email Address. o Attribute Name: The name of the attribute that will appear in SDP). This MUST conform to the definition of <att-field>. o Attribute Syntax: For a value attribute (see clause 5.13), an ABNF definition of the attribute value <att-value> syntax (see Section 9) MUST be provided. The syntax MUST follow the rule form as per Section 2.2 of [RFC5234] and [RFC7405]. This SHALL define Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 45] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 the allowable values that the attribute might take. It MAY also define an extension method for the addition of future values. For a property attribute, the ABNF definition is omitted as the property attribute takes no values. o Attribute Semantics: For a value attribute, a semantic description of the values that the attribute might take MUST be provided. The usage of a property attribute is described under purpose below. o Attribute Value: The name of an ABNF syntax rule defining the syntax of the value. Absence of a rule name indicates that the attribute takes no values. Enclosing the rule name in "[" and "]" indicates that a value is optional. o Usage Level: Usage level(s) of the attribute. This MUST be one or more of the following: session, media, source, dcsa and dcsa(subprotocol). For a definition of source level attributes, see [RFC5576]. For a definition of dcsa attributes see: [I-D.ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg]. o Charset Dependent: This MUST be "Yes" or "No" depending on whether the attribute value is subject to the charset attribute. o Purpose: An explanation of the purpose and usage of the attribute. o O/A Procedures: Offer/Answer procedures as explained in [RFC3264]. o Mux Category: This MUST indicate one of the following categories: NORMAL, NOT RECOMMENDED, IDENTICAL, SUM, TRANSPORT, INHERIT, IDENTICAL-PER-PT, SPECIAL or TBD as defined by [I-D.ietf-mmusic- sdp-mux-attributes]. o Reference: A reference to the specification defining the attribute. The above is the minimum that IANA will accept. Attributes that are expected to see widespread use and interoperability SHOULD be documented with a standards-track RFC that specifies the attribute more precisely. Submitters of registrations should ensure that the specification is in the spirit of SDP attributes, most notably that the attribute is platform independent in the sense that it makes no implicit assumptions about operating systems and does not name specific pieces of software in a manner that might inhibit interoperability. Submitters of registrations should also carefully choose the attribute usage level. They should not choose only "session" when Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 46] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 the attribute can have different values when media is disaggregated, i.e., when each m= section has its own IP address on a different endpoint. In that case the attribute type chosen should be "session, media" or "media" (depending on desired semantics). The default rule is that for all new SDP attributes that can occur both in session and media level, the media level overrides the session level. When this is not the case for a new SDP attribute, it MUST be explicitly stated. IANA has registered the initial set of attribute names ("att-field" values) with definitions as in Section 6 of this memo (these definitions replace those in [RFC4566]). 8.2.4.2. Updates to Existing Attributes Updated attribute registrations are accepted according to the "Specification Required" policy of [RFC8126]. The Designated Expert reviewing the update is requested to evaluate whether the update is compatible with the prior intent and use of the attribute, and whether the new document is of sufficient maturity and authority in relation to the prior document. The specification updating the attribute (for example, by adding a new value) MUST update registration information items from Section 8.2.4.1 according to the following constraints: o Contact Name: A name for an entity responsible for the update MUST be provided. o Contact Email Address: An email address for an entity responsible for the update MUST be provided. o Attribute Name: MUST be provided and MUST NOT be changed. Otherwise it is a new attribute. o Attribute Syntax: The existing rule syntax with the syntax extensions MUST be provided if there is a change to the syntax. A revision to an existing attribute usage MAY extend the syntax of an attribute, but MUST be backward compatible. o Attribute Semantics: A semantic description of new additional attribute values or a semantic extension of existing values. Existing attribute values semantics MUST only be extended in a backward compatible manner. o Usage Level: Updates MAY only add additional levels. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 47] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 o Charset Dependent: MUST NOT be changed. o Purpose: MAY be extended according to the updated usage. o O/A Procedures: MAY be updated in a backward compatible manner and/or it applies to a new usage level only. o Mux Category: No change unless from "TBD" to another value (see [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes]. It MAY also change if 'media' level is being added to the definition of an attribute that previously did not include it. o Reference: A new (additional or replacement) reference MUST be provided. Items SHOULD be omitted if there is no impact to them as a result of the attribute update. 8.2.5. Bandwidth Specifiers ("bwtype") A proliferation of bandwidth specifiers is strongly discouraged. New bandwidth specifiers (<bwtype> sub-field values) MUST be registered with IANA. The submission MUST reference a standards- track RFC specifying the semantics of the bandwidth specifier precisely, and indicating when it should be used, and why the existing registered bandwidth specifiers do not suffice. The RFC MUST specify the Mux Category for this value as defined by [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes]. The format of the "bwtype" registry is: -------------------------------------------------- | Type | SDP Name | Mux Category | Reference | -------------------------------------------------- IANA is requested to update the "bwtype" registry entries for the bandwidth specifiers "CT" and "AS" with the definitions in Section 5.8 of this memo (these definitions replace those in [RFC4566]). 8.2.6. Network Types ("nettype") Network type "IN", representing the Internet, is defined in Section 5.2 and Section 5.7 of this memo. (This definition replaces that in [RFC4566].) Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 48] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 To enable SDP to reference a new non-Internet environment a new network type (<nettype> sub-field value) MUST be registered with IANA. The registration is subject to the "RFC Required" policy of [RFC8126]. Although non-Internet environments are not normally the preserve of IANA, there may be circumstances when an Internet application needs to interoperate with a non-Internet application, such as when gatewaying an Internet telephone call into the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). The number of network types should be small and should be rarely extended. A new network type registration MUST reference an RFC that gives details of the network type and the address type(s) that may be used with it. The format of the "nettype" registry is: -------------------------------------------------------------------- |Type | SDP Name | Usable addrtype Values | Reference | -------------------------------------------------------------------- IANA is requested to update the "nettype" registry to this new format. The following is the updated content of th registry: -------------------------------------------------------------------- |Type | SDP Name | Usable addrtype Values | Reference | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |nettype | IN | IP4, IP6 | [RFCXXXX] | |nettype | TN | RFC2543 | [RFC2848] | |nettype | ATM | NSAP, GWID, E164 | [RFC3108] | |nettype | PSTN | E164 | [RFC7195] | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Note that both [RFC7195] and [RFC3108] registered "E164" as an address type, although [RFC7195] mentions that the "E164" address type has a different context for ATM and PSTN networks. 8.2.7. Address Types ("addrtype") New address types ("addrtype") MUST be registered with IANA. The registration is subject to the "RFC Required" policy of [RFC8126]. A new address type registration MUST reference an RFC giving details of the syntax of the address type. Address types are not expected to be registered frequently. Section 5.7 of this document gives new definitions of address types "IP4" and "IP6". Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 49] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 8.3. Encryption Key Access Methods (OBSOLETE) The IANA previously maintained a table of SDP encryption key access method ("enckey") names. This table is obsolete, since the "k=" line is not extensible. New registrations MUST NOT be accepted. 9. SDP Grammar This section provides an Augmented BNF grammar for SDP. ABNF is defined in [RFC5234] and [RFC7405]. ; SDP Syntax session-description = version-field origin-field session-name-field [information-field] [uri-field] *email-field *phone-field [connection-field] *bandwidth-field 1*time-description [key-field] *attribute-field *media-description version-field = %s"v" "=" 1*DIGIT CRLF ;this memo describes version 0 origin-field = %s"o" "=" username SP sess-id SP sess-version SP nettype SP addrtype SP unicast-address CRLF session-name-field = %s"s" "=" text CRLF information-field = %s"i" "=" text CRLF uri-field = %s"u" "=" uri CRLF email-field = %s"e" "=" email-address CRLF phone-field = %s"p" "=" phone-number CRLF connection-field = %s"c" "=" nettype SP addrtype SP connection-address CRLF ;a connection field must be present ;in every media description or at the ;session level Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 50] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 bandwidth-field = %s"b" "=" bwtype ":" bandwidth CRLF time-description = time-field [repeat-description] repeat-description = 1*repeat-field [zone-field] time-field = %s"t" "=" start-time SP stop-time CRLF repeat-field = %s"r" "=" repeat-interval SP typed-time 1*(SP typed-time) CRLF zone-field = %s"z" "=" time SP ["-"] typed-time *(SP time SP ["-"] typed-time) CRLF key-field = %s"k" "=" key-type CRLF attribute-field = %s"a" "=" attribute CRLF media-description = media-field [information-field] *connection-field *bandwidth-field [key-field] *attribute-field media-field = %s"m" "=" media SP port ["/" integer] SP proto 1*(SP fmt) CRLF ; sub-rules of 'o=' username = non-ws-string ;pretty wide definition, but doesn't ;include space sess-id = 1*DIGIT ;should be unique for this username/host sess-version = 1*DIGIT nettype = token ;typically "IN" addrtype = token ;typically "IP4" or "IP6" ; sub-rules of 'u=' uri = URI-reference Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 51] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 ; see RFC 3986 ; sub-rules of 'e=', see RFC 5322 for definitions email-address = address-and-comment / dispname-and-address / addr-spec address-and-comment = addr-spec 1*SP "(" 1*email-safe ")" dispname-and-address = 1*email-safe 1*SP "<" addr-spec ">" ; sub-rules of 'p=' phone-number = phone *SP "(" 1*email-safe ")" / 1*email-safe "<" phone ">" / phone phone = ["+"] DIGIT 1*(SP / "-" / DIGIT) ; sub-rules of 'c=' connection-address = multicast-address / unicast-address ; sub-rules of 'b=' bwtype = token bandwidth = 1*DIGIT ; sub-rules of 't=' start-time = time / "0" stop-time = time / "0" time = POS-DIGIT 9*DIGIT ; Decimal representation of time in ; seconds since January 1, 1900 UTC. ; The representation is an unbounded ; length field containing at least ; 10 digits. Unlike some representations ; used elsewhere, time in SDP does not ; wrap in the year 2036. ; sub-rules of 'r=' and 'z=' repeat-interval = POS-DIGIT *DIGIT [fixed-len-time-unit] typed-time = 1*DIGIT [fixed-len-time-unit] fixed-len-time-unit = %s"d" / %s"h" / %s"m" / %s"s" ; NOTE: These units are case-sensitive. ; sub-rules of 'k=' key-type = %s"prompt" / %s"clear:" text / Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 52] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 %s"base64:" base64 / %s"uri:" uri ; NOTE: These names are case-sensitive. base64 = *base64-unit [base64-pad] base64-unit = 4base64-char base64-pad = 2base64-char "==" / 3base64-char "=" base64-char = ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "/" ; sub-rules of 'a=' attribute = (att-field ":" att-value) / att-field att-field = token att-value = byte-string ; sub-rules of 'm=' media = token ;typically "audio", "video", "text", "image" ;or "application" fmt = token ;typically an RTP payload type for audio ;and video media proto = token *("/" token) ;typically "RTP/AVP" or "udp" port = 1*DIGIT ; generic sub-rules: addressing unicast-address = IP4-address / IP6-address / FQDN / extn-addr multicast-address = IP4-multicast / IP6-multicast / FQDN / extn-addr IP4-multicast = m1 3( "." decimal-uchar ) "/" ttl [ "/" numaddr ] ; IP4 multicast addresses may be in the ; range 224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255 m1 = ("22" ("4"/"5"/"6"/"7"/"8"/"9")) / ("23" DIGIT ) IP6-multicast = IP6-address [ "/" numaddr ] ; IP6 address starting with FF numaddr = integer Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 53] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 ttl = (POS-DIGIT *2DIGIT) / "0" FQDN = 4*(alpha-numeric / "-" / ".") ; fully qualified domain name as specified ; in RFC 1035 (and updates) IP4-address = b1 3("." decimal-uchar) b1 = decimal-uchar ; less than "224" IP6-address = 6( h16 ":" ) ls32 / "::" 5( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ h16 ] "::" 4( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ *1( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" 3( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ *2( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" 2( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ *3( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" h16 ":" ls32 / [ *4( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" ls32 / [ *5( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" h16 / [ *6( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" h16 = 1*4HEXDIG ls32 = ( h16 ":" h16 ) / IP4-address ; Generic for other address families extn-addr = non-ws-string ; generic sub-rules: datatypes text = byte-string ;default is to interpret this as UTF8 text. ;ISO 8859-1 requires "a=charset:ISO-8859-1" ;session-level attribute to be used byte-string = 1*(%x01-09/%x0B-0C/%x0E-FF) ;any byte except NUL, CR, or LF non-ws-string = 1*(VCHAR/%x80-FF) ;string of visible characters token-char = ALPHA / DIGIT / "!" / "#" / "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" ; (single quote) / "*" / "+" / "-" / "." / "^" / "_" / "`" ; (Grave accent) / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~" token = 1*(token-char) Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 54] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 email-safe = %x01-09/%x0B-0C/%x0E-27/%x2A-3B/%x3D/%x3F-FF ;any byte except NUL, CR, LF, or the quoting ;characters ()<> integer = POS-DIGIT *DIGIT zero-based-integer = "0" / integer non-zero-int-or-real = integer / non-zero-real non-zero-real = zero-based-integer "." *DIGIT POS-DIGIT ; generic sub-rules: primitives alpha-numeric = ALPHA / DIGIT POS-DIGIT = %x31-39 ; 1 - 9 decimal-uchar = DIGIT / POS-DIGIT DIGIT / ("1" 2(DIGIT)) / ("2" ("0"/"1"/"2"/"3"/"4") DIGIT) / ("2" "5" ("0"/"1"/"2"/"3"/"4"/"5")) ; external references: ALPHA = <ALPHA definition from RFC5234> DIGIT = <DIGIT definition from RFC5234> CRLF = <CRLF definition from RFC5234> HEXDIG = <HEXDIG definition from RFC5234> SP = <SP definition from RFC5234> VCHAR = <VCHAR definition from RFC5234> URI-reference = <URI-reference definition from RFC3986> addr-spec = <addr-spec definition from RFC5322> 10. Summary of Changes from RFC 4566 o Generally clarified and refined terminology. o Identified now-obsolete items: "a=cat", "a=keywds", "k=". o Updated normative and informative references, and added references to additional relevant related RFCs. o Reformatted the SDP Attributes section for readability. The syntax of attribute values is now given in ABNF. o Made mandatory the sending of RTCP with inactive media streams. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 55] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 o Removed the section "Private Sessions". That section dates back to a time when the primary use of SDP was with SAP (Session Announcement Protocol). That has fallen out of use. Now the vast majority of uses of SDP is for establishment of private sessions. The considerations for that are covered in Section 7. o Expanded and clarified the specification of the "lang" and "sdplang" attributes. o Removed some references to SAP because it is no longer in widespread use. o Changed the way <fmt> values for UDP transport are registered. o Changed the mechanism and documentation required for registering new attributes. o Tightened up IANA registration procedures for extensions. Removed phone number and long-form name. o Expanded the IANA nettype registry to identify valid addrtypes. o Reorganized the several IANA att-type registries into a single registry o Revised ABNF syntax for clarity. Backward compatibility is maintained with a few exceptions: * Revised the syntax of time descriptions ("t=", "r=", "z=") to remove ambiguities. Clarified that "z=" only modifies the immediately preceding "r=" lines. Made "z=" without a preceding "r=" a syntax error. (This is incompatible with certain aberrant usage.) * Updated the "IP6-address" and "IP6-multicast" rules, consistent with the syntax in RFC3986. (This mirrors a bug fix made to RFC3261 by RFC5964.) Removed rules that were unused as a result of this change. o Revised normative statements that were redundant with ABNF syntax, making the text non-normative. o Revised IPv4 unicast and multicast addresses in the example SDP descriptions per RFCs 5735 and 5771. o Changed some examples to use IPv6 addresses, and added additional examples using IPv6. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 56] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 o Incorporated case-insensitivity rules from RFC 4855. o Revised sections that incorrectly referenced NTP. o Clarified the explanation of the impact and use of a=charset. o Revised the description of a=type to remove implication that it sometimes changes the default media direction to something other than sendrecv. 11. Acknowledgements Many people in the IETF Multiparty Multimedia Session Control (MMUSIC) working group have made comments and suggestions contributing to this document. In particular, we would like to thank the following people who contributed to the creation of this document or one of its predecessor documents: Adam Roach, Allison Mankin, Bernie Hoeneisen, Bill Fenner, Carsten Bormann, Eve Schooler, Flemming Andreasen, Gonzalo Camarillo, Joerg Ott, John Elwell, Jon Peterson, Jonathan Lennox, Jonathan Rosenberg, Keith Drage, Peter Parnes, Rob Lanphier, Ross Finlayson, Sean Olson, Spencer Dawkins, Steve Casner, Steve Hanna, Van Jacobson. 12. References 12.1. Normative References [E164] International Telecommunication Union, "E.164 : The international public telecommunication numbering plan", ITU Recommendation E.164, November 2010. [I-D.ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg] Drage, K., Makaraju, M., Ejzak, R., Marcon, J., and R. Even, "SDP-based Data Channel Negotiation", draft-ietf- mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-28 (work in progress), May 2019. [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes] Nandakumar, S., "A Framework for SDP Attributes when Multiplexing", draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-17 (work in progress), February 2018. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 57] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 [ISO.8859-1.1998] International Organization for Standardization, "Information technology - 8-bit single byte coded graphic - character sets - Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1, JTC1/ SC2", ISO/IEC Standard 8859-1, 1998. [RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, DOI 10.17487/RFC1034, November 1987, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1034>. [RFC1035] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035, November 1987, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1035>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC2848] Petrack, S. and L. Conroy, "The PINT Service Protocol: Extensions to SIP and SDP for IP Access to Telephone Call Services", RFC 2848, DOI 10.17487/RFC2848, June 2000, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2848>. [RFC2978] Freed, N. and J. Postel, "IANA Charset Registration Procedures", BCP 19, RFC 2978, DOI 10.17487/RFC2978, October 2000, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2978>. [RFC3108] Kumar, R. and M. Mostafa, "Conventions for the use of the Session Description Protocol (SDP) for ATM Bearer Connections", RFC 3108, DOI 10.17487/RFC3108, May 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3108>. [RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November 2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>. [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>. [RFC4145] Yon, D. and G. Camarillo, "TCP-Based Media Transport in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 4145, DOI 10.17487/RFC4145, September 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4145>. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 58] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 [RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session Description Protocol", RFC 4566, DOI 10.17487/RFC4566, July 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4566>. [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>. [RFC5576] Lennox, J., Ott, J., and T. Schierl, "Source-Specific Media Attributes in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 5576, DOI 10.17487/RFC5576, June 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5576>. [RFC5646] Phillips, A., Ed. and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, DOI 10.17487/RFC5646, September 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646>. [RFC5890] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework", RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>. [RFC5952] Kawamura, S. and M. Kawashima, "A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation", RFC 5952, DOI 10.17487/RFC5952, August 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5952>. [RFC6135] Holmberg, C. and S. Blau, "An Alternative Connection Model for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)", RFC 6135, DOI 10.17487/RFC6135, February 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6135>. [RFC7195] Garcia-Martin, M. and S. Veikkolainen, "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Extension for Setting Audio and Video Media Streams over Circuit-Switched Bearers in the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN)", RFC 7195, DOI 10.17487/RFC7195, May 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7195>. [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 59] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 12.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp] Petit-Huguenin, M., Nandakumar, S., Keranen, A., Shpount, R., and C. Holmberg, "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer procedures for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)", draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-38 (work in progress), August 2019. [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation] Holmberg, C., Alvestrand, H., and C. Jennings, "Negotiating Media Multiplexing Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle- negotiation-54 (work in progress), December 2018. [ITU.H332.1998] International Telecommunication Union, "H.323 extended for loosely coupled conferences", ITU Recommendation H.332, September 1998. [RFC2045] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies", RFC 2045, DOI 10.17487/RFC2045, November 1996, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2045>. [RFC2327] Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description Protocol", RFC 2327, DOI 10.17487/RFC2327, April 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2327>. [RFC2974] Handley, M., Perkins, C., and E. Whelan, "Session Announcement Protocol", RFC 2974, DOI 10.17487/RFC2974, October 2000, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2974>. [RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>. [RFC3264] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264, DOI 10.17487/RFC3264, June 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3264>. [RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, DOI 10.17487/RFC3550, July 2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3550>. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 60] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 [RFC3551] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control", STD 65, RFC 3551, DOI 10.17487/RFC3551, July 2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3551>. [RFC3556] Casner, S., "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Bandwidth Modifiers for RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Bandwidth", RFC 3556, DOI 10.17487/RFC3556, July 2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3556>. [RFC3605] Huitema, C., "Real Time Control Protocol (RTCP) attribute in Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3605, DOI 10.17487/RFC3605, October 2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3605>. [RFC3711] Baugher, M., McGrew, D., Naslund, M., Carrara, E., and K. Norrman, "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)", RFC 3711, DOI 10.17487/RFC3711, March 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3711>. [RFC3840] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., and P. Kyzivat, "Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 3840, DOI 10.17487/RFC3840, August 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3840>. [RFC3890] Westerlund, M., "A Transport Independent Bandwidth Modifier for the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3890, DOI 10.17487/RFC3890, September 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3890>. [RFC4568] Andreasen, F., Baugher, M., and D. Wing, "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Security Descriptions for Media Streams", RFC 4568, DOI 10.17487/RFC4568, July 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4568>. [RFC4855] Casner, S., "Media Type Registration of RTP Payload Formats", RFC 4855, DOI 10.17487/RFC4855, February 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4855>. [RFC5322] Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322, DOI 10.17487/RFC5322, October 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5322>. [RFC5888] Camarillo, G. and H. Schulzrinne, "The Session Description Protocol (SDP) Grouping Framework", RFC 5888, DOI 10.17487/RFC5888, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5888>. Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 61] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 [RFC6466] Salgueiro, G., "IANA Registration of the 'image' Media Type for the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 6466, DOI 10.17487/RFC6466, December 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6466>. [RFC6838] Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, January 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6838>. [RFC7230] Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing", RFC 7230, DOI 10.17487/RFC7230, June 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7230>. [RFC7405] Kyzivat, P., "Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF", RFC 7405, DOI 10.17487/RFC7405, December 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7405>. [RFC7656] Lennox, J., Gross, K., Nandakumar, S., Salgueiro, G., and B. Burman, Ed., "A Taxonomy of Semantics and Mechanisms for Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) Sources", RFC 7656, DOI 10.17487/RFC7656, November 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7656>. [RFC7826] Schulzrinne, H., Rao, A., Lanphier, R., Westerlund, M., and M. Stiemerling, Ed., "Real-Time Streaming Protocol Version 2.0", RFC 7826, DOI 10.17487/RFC7826, December 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7826>. [RFC8445] Keranen, A., Holmberg, C., and J. Rosenberg, "Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal", RFC 8445, DOI 10.17487/RFC8445, July 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8445>. Authors' Addresses Ali Begen Networked Media Konya Turkey EMail: ali.begen@networked.media Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 62] Internet-Draft SDP August 2019 Paul Kyzivat USA EMail: pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu Colin Perkins University of Glasgow School of Computing Science University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QQ UK EMail: csp@csperkins.org Mark Handley University College London Department of Computer Science London WC1E 6BT UK EMail: M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk Begen, et al. Expires February 10, 2020 [Page 63]