AAA NAI for Mobile IPv4 Extension
draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-06
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2015-10-14
|
06 | (System) | Notify list changed from , , to |
2012-08-22
|
06 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Steven Bellovin |
2012-08-22
|
06 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie |
2004-01-15
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to Dead from Approved-announcement to be sent by Thomas Narten |
2004-01-15
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Note]: 'This document has been replaced by draft-ietf-mip4-aaa-nai. (The mobileip WG was closed, and mip4 has inherited this document.)' added by Thomas Narten |
2004-01-02
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Thomas Narten |
2004-01-02
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Note]: '2003-12-22: Version -02 is out, should address the discuss issues. This version also contains some language cleanups to make the option more applicable to … [Note]: '2003-12-22: Version -02 is out, should address the discuss issues. This version also contains some language cleanups to make the option more applicable to NAIs in general, with AAA NAIs being just an example.' has been cleared by Thomas Narten |
2003-12-22
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Steve Bellovin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Steve Bellovin |
2003-12-22
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie |
2003-12-22
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] Nit in Section 4.: The extension only need to be included in subsequent should be the "The extions only needs to be included" |
2003-12-22
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Note]: '2003-12-22: Version -02 is out, should address the discuss issues. This version also contains some language cleanups to make the option more applicable to … [Note]: '2003-12-22: Version -02 is out, should address the discuss issues. This version also contains some language cleanups to make the option more applicable to NAIs in general, with AAA NAIs being just an example.' added by Thomas Narten |
2003-12-22
|
06 | Thomas Narten | Version -02 is out, should address the discuss issues. This version also contains some language cleanups to make the option more applicable to NAIs in … Version -02 is out, should address the discuss issues. This version also contains some language cleanups to make the option more applicable to NAIs in general, with AAA NAIs being just an example. |
2003-12-22
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Note]: 'Ready for IESG review; Note that IETF LC ends on September 17.' has been cleared by Thomas Narten |
2003-11-21
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot comment] |
2003-09-29
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot comment] Let me change this to something else. |
2003-09-29
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot comment] testing of deletes |
2003-09-23
|
06 | (System) | Document has expired |
2003-09-22
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2003-09-22
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-09-18 by Amy Vezza |
2003-09-22
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Thomas Narten |
2003-09-18
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bert Wijnen |
2003-09-18
|
06 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bill Fenner |
2003-09-18
|
06 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] Position has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Jon Peterson |
2003-09-18
|
06 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot comment] From last paragraph of Introduction: This is unfortunately not enough, since the AAA infrastructure needs to know the FQDN identity of … [Ballot comment] From last paragraph of Introduction: This is unfortunately not enough, since the AAA infrastructure needs to know the FQDN identity of the home agent to be able to correctly handle the assignment of the home agent. Some further elaboration on this motivation would be nice. Why doesn't the network address suffice? What does the 'AAA infrastructure' do with the FQDN identity of the home agent? If these questions were answered in the draft, it might make the impact of this mechanism on (for example) the security of the protocol a bit more clear. |
2003-09-18
|
06 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded by Jon Peterson |
2003-09-17
|
06 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Margaret Wasserman |
2003-09-17
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] There are many acronyms in the Abstract and Introduction that need to be expanded. In the last paragraph of section 1, the … [Ballot comment] There are many acronyms in the Abstract and Introduction that need to be expanded. In the last paragraph of section 1, the document says: "One way of solving this problem would be ..." Shouldn't it say: "This problem is solved by ..." The document uses "AAA NAI extension" and "AAA-NAI extension." Please pick one spelling. |
2003-09-17
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2003-09-16
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot discuss] The text says "It is assumed that the Mobile IP messages that would carry these extensions would be authenticated in … [Ballot discuss] The text says "It is assumed that the Mobile IP messages that would carry these extensions would be authenticated in the manner that is described in [4], or any follow-on authentication mechanisms." That leaves the mandatory-to-implement status unclear. It should say "The Mobile IP messages that carry this extension MUST be authenticated as described in [4], unless other authentication methods have been agreed upon." This can be fixed with an RFC Editor's Note, I suspect. |
2003-09-16
|
06 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Steve Bellovin |
2003-09-16
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot discuss] 2. Requirements terminology The Mobile IP related described in RFC 3344 [1] is used in this document. TH> Above statement seems … [Ballot discuss] 2. Requirements terminology The Mobile IP related described in RFC 3344 [1] is used in this document. TH> Above statement seems to be a duplicate of that below, or is missing a noun. Section 4. The Home Agent MUST provide this in the first Registration Reply sent to the Mobile Node destined through the AAA infrastructure. The extension only need to be included in subsequent Registration Replies if the same extension is included in Registration Requests received from the same Mobile Node. ****>Why is this a MUST? It looks like the choice to use this is deployment specific. A mobile node that recieves this extension in a registration reply message MUST provide it in every registration request when re- authentication is needed. If the mobile node requests a specific home agent and it has the information available it MUST provide this extension in its initial registration request. ****>This seems to imply there are no conditions under which the mobile node would go back to the base state, which seems odd (at the very least, a failure to reach the AAAH looks like it ought to result in a reversion to base state) |
2003-09-16
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ted Hardie |
2003-09-12
|
06 | Ned Freed | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ned Freed |
2003-09-12
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] Position has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Thomas Narten |
2003-09-12
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot discuss] |
2003-09-12
|
06 | Thomas Narten | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-09-18 by Thomas Narten |
2003-09-12
|
06 | Thomas Narten | Ballot has been issued by Thomas Narten |
2003-09-12
|
06 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2003-09-12
|
06 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2003-09-12
|
06 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2003-09-03
|
06 | Michael Lee | Last call sent |
2003-09-03
|
06 | Michael Lee | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Michael Lee |
2003-09-03
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Thomas Narten |
2003-09-03
|
06 | Thomas Narten | IETF LC originally run in January, will re-run since so much time has elapsed. Current doc looks fine to me, except for some nits (sent … IETF LC originally run in January, will re-run since so much time has elapsed. Current doc looks fine to me, except for some nits (sent directly to authors). |
2003-09-02
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-06.txt |
2003-08-27
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Thomas Narten |
2003-08-27
|
06 | Thomas Narten | Has a normative reference to draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-mobileip, authors have agreed to remove this, then it can go forward. |
2003-06-23
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to AD Evaluation from IESG Evaluation by Narten, Thomas |
2003-06-17
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot discuss] testing of comments |
2003-06-17
|
06 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot discuss] testing of discuss |
2003-06-17
|
06 | Thomas Narten | Created "Approve" ballot |
2003-06-17
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Narten, Thomas |
2003-03-07
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-05.txt |
2003-02-02
|
06 | Stephen Coya | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by Coya, Steve |
2003-01-17
|
06 | Jacqueline Hargest | Status date has been changed to 2003-1-31 from |
2003-01-17
|
06 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Hargest, Jacqueline |
2003-01-17
|
06 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Hargest, Jacqueline |
2003-01-17
|
06 | Thomas Narten | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Narten, Thomas |
2003-01-17
|
06 | Thomas Narten | Request to advance as PS. |
2003-01-17
|
06 | Thomas Narten | Draft Added by Narten, Thomas |
2003-01-10
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-04.txt |
2002-11-27
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-03.txt |
2002-05-30
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-02.txt |
2002-05-17
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-01.txt |
2002-04-18
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai-00.txt |