Motivations and Scenarios for Using Multiple Interfaces and Global Addresses
draft-ietf-monami6-multihoming-motivation-scenario-03

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (mext WG)
Last updated 2008-05-02
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-monami6-multihoming-motivation-scenario-03.txt

Abstract

In this document, multihoming is investigated from an end-node point of view, and not from a site point of view as the term "multihoming" is commonly understood so far. The purpose of this document is to explain the motivations for fixed and mobile nodes (hosts and routers) using multiple interfaces and the scenarios where this may end up using multiple global addresses on their interfaces. Such multihoming configurations can bring a number of benefits once appropriate support mechanisms are put in place. Interestingly, this analysis is generic, i.e. motivations and benefits of node multihoming apply to both fixed end nodes and mobile end nodes.

Authors

Thierry Ernst (thierry.ernst@inria.fr)
Nicolas Montavont (nicolas.montavont@telecom-bretagne.eu)
Ryuji Wakikawa (ryuji@jp.toyota-itc.com)
Chan-Wah Ng (chanwah.ng@sg.panasonic.com)
Koojana Kuladinithi (koo@comnets.uni-bremen.de)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)