Skip to main content

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Stack Entry: "EXP" Field Renamed to "Traffic Class" Field
draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def-08

Yes

(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

Comment (2008-12-16)
Section 1.2, paragraph 7:
>           The EXP field has been renamed to the TC field, and thus all
>           references in RFC 3270 to EXP field SHOULD be taken to refer
>           to the TC field.

  I think the "SHOULD" here needs to be a "MUST" - otherwise it leaves
  the option of not using the new name. (And I don't believe an RFC2119
  term is appropriate here, so it should be a lowercase "must".) Similar
  phrasings occur in Sections 2.3 and 2.4, and they should be changed
  accordingly.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(David Ward; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2008-12-17)
Abstract

s/current use of the EXP this field/current use of this field/

Section 1. Introduction

s/after the work on the document were started/after the work on the document was started/

Section 3. Use of the TC field

s/have different TF fields from the rest/have different TC fields from the rest/