Label Advertisement Discipline for LDP FECs
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (mpls WG)
Last updated 2014-03-09 (latest revision 2014-01-20)
Replaces draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Other - see Comment Log
Document shepherd Loa Andersson
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2014-01-28)
IESG IESG state Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date
Responsible AD Adrian Farrel
Send notices to mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv@tools.ietf.org
IANA IANA review state IANA - Not OK
IANA action state None
MPLS Working Group                                          Kamran Raza
Internet Draft                                             Sami Boutros 
Updates: 5036, 4447, 5918, 6388, 3212                      Luca Martini 
Intended status: Standards Track                    Cisco Systems, Inc. 
Expires: July 19, 2014                                             
                                                        Nicolai Leymann
                                                       Deutsche Telekom
    
                                                        
                                                       January 20, 2014 

                                      
                Label Advertisement Discipline for LDP FECs 
                                      
            draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02.txt 
                                      
Abstract 

  The label advertising behavior of an LDP speaker for a given FEC is 
  governed by the FEC type and not necessarily by the LDP session's 
  negotiated label advertisement mode. This document updates RFC 5036 
  to make that fact clear, as well as updates RFC 3212, RFC 4447, 
  RFC 5918, and RFC 6388 by specifying the label advertisement mode 
  for all currently defined FECs. 
    
 Status of this Memo 

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the 
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.  

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that 
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts. 

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six 
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents 
   at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as 
   reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt 

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 

   This Internet-Draft will expire on July 19, 2014. 

 
 
 
Raza, et. al                  Expires July 2014                [Page 1] 

     
Internet-Draft   Label Advertisement Discipline for LDP FECs   Jan 2014 
      
Copyright Notice 

   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the 
   document authors. All rights reserved. 

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal 
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents 
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of 
   publication of this document. Please review these documents 
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with 
   respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this 
   document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in 
   Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without 
   warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. 

Table of Contents 

  1. Introduction                                                     2 
  2. Label Advertisement Discipline                                   3 
     2.1. Update to RFC-5036                                          3 
     2.2. Specification for LDP FECs                                  4 
  3. Security Considerations                                          4 
  4. IANA Considerations                                              4 
  5. References                                                       5 
     5.1. Normative References                                        5 
     5.2. Informative References                                      5 
  6. Acknowledgments                                                  5 
    

1. Introduction 

  Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) [RFC5036] allows label 
  advertisement mode negotiation at the time of session establishment. 
  LDP specification also dictates that only single label advertisement 
  mode is negotiated, agreed and used for a given LDP session between 
  two LSRs. 
   
  The negotiated label advertisement mode defined in RFC 5036 and 
  carried in the LDP Initialization message is only indicative. It 
  indicates how the LDP speakers on a session will advertise labels for 
  some FECs, but it is not a rule that restricts the speakers to behave 
  in a specific way.  Furthermore, for some FEC types the advertising 
  behavior of the LDP speaker is governed by the FEC type and not by 

 
 
Raza, et. al                  Expires July 2014                [Page 2] 


Internet-Draft   Label Advertisement Discipline for LDP FECs   Jan 2014 
 
  the negotiated behavior. 
   
  This document updates [RFC5036] to make that fact clear, and updates 
  [RFC3212], [RFC4447], [RFC5036], [RFC5918], and [RFC6388] to indicate
  for each FEC type that has already been defined whether the label 
Show full document text