Label Advertisement Discipline for LDP Forwarding Equivalence Classes (FECs)
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-03
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
This document updates [RFC5036] to make that fact clear, as well as updates [RFC3212], [RFC4447], [RFC5918], [RFC6388], and [RFC7140] to indicate Hopefully, the RFC editor will expand those RFCs into their respective titles, to improve readability. Sorry, I don't know by heart the LDP-related RFC numbers :-) Note: no need to reply to this comment.
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection
FEC should be expanded on first use. Otherwise, this document looks fine to my untrained eye. :)