Label Advertisement Discipline for LDP Forwarding Equivalence Classes (FECs)
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-03
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
(Alia Atlas) Yes
(Adrian Farrel) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Richard Barnes) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
Comment (2014-04-22)
No email
send info
send info
This document updates [RFC5036] to make that fact clear, as well as updates [RFC3212], [RFC4447], [RFC5918], [RFC6388], and [RFC7140] to indicate Hopefully, the RFC editor will expand those RFCs into their respective titles, to improve readability. Sorry, I don't know by heart the LDP-related RFC numbers :-) Note: no need to reply to this comment.
Alissa Cooper No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection
Barry Leiba No Objection
(Ted Lemon) No Objection
Comment (2014-04-23)
No email
send info
send info
FEC should be expanded on first use. Otherwise, this document looks fine to my untrained eye. :)