LDP IP and PW Capability
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (mpls WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Syed Raza , Sami Boutros | ||
| Last updated | 2012-08-18 (Latest revision 2012-02-15) | ||
| Replaces | draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Reviews |
SECDIR Last Call review
(of
-07)
Has Nits
|
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-01.txt
Abstract
Currently, no LDP capability is exchanged for LDP applications like IP label switching and L2VPN/PW signaling. When an LDP session comes up, an LDP speaker may unnecessarily advertise its local state for such LDP applications even when the peer session may be established for some other applications like ICCP. This document proposes a solution by which an LDP speaker announces its disinterest or non- support for IP label switching or L2VPN/PW application, hence disabling corresponding application state exchange over the established LDP session.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)