IANA Registries for LSP Ping Code Points
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry-03
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -02)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-03-05 for -02)
Unknown
Pete's comments make perfect sense to me, too. That said, I think Section 2.2 is not wrong and not confusing the way it is, so it's not a big deal either way (if I had to be picky, I'd say that with respect to the specification of the registration policy at the top of the section, 5226 uses "Experimental Use", not "Experimental" ("Experimental" is for labelling the code points, as later in the section); but I would never be so picky).
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-03-03 for -02)
Unknown
It's not at all clear to me why this document is going for Standards Track or why it updates 4379 and 6424, nor does the ballot nor shepherd writeup explain. It's creating a registry, which doesn't change the protocol in either of those documents. Seems to me fine that it be Informational, and that it doesn't update anything. 2.2, 2.3, 2.4: OLD The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry are: 0-250 Standards Action 251-254 Experimental 255 Standards Action NEW The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry is Standards Action. The registration policy for the entire registry is "Standards Action". Within the registry itself, the values 251-254 should be marked Experimental (which they are) and 255 should be marked Reserved (which it is), but that doesn't change the registration policy.
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-03-04 for -02)
Unknown
Pete's comments make perfect sense to me.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown