RFC8287 Sub-TLV Length Clarification
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-04

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Deborah Brungard Yes

Alissa Cooper (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-08-27)
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS.

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Comment (2019-08-05 for -02)
** Section 4, per “The figures in section 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 of [RFC8287] are replaced by the below figures in section 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 respectively”:

--  none of the diagram in Section 4.1, 4.2 or 4.3 are explicitly labeled as figures

-- section 4.3 contains two “figures” (one is called a table in the text and the other has no designation).  Which one of these is supposed to be a replacement for RFC8287 Section 5.3?

** Section 4.3.  Assuming that the second figure is the replacement for RFC8287’s Section 5.3 figure, the length is still confusing to me.  The figure in this draft appears to be a specific instance of the populated Sub-TLV.  The existing figure in RFC8287 appears to be a generic depiction.  The new figure doesn’t appear to be relevant (or presented incorrect information) if Adj Type = 1 and Protocol = 1 (for example).

** Section 4.3.  Typo.  s/Protocol =0/Protocol = 0/

** Section 6. Recommend clarifying that there are no additional security considerations (not that there aren’t any).  s/This document updates [RFC8287] and does not introduce any security considerations/This document updates [RFC8287] and does not introduce any additional security considerations/

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Comment (2019-08-07 for -02)
Please use the BCP 14 boilerplate from RFC 8174 (the current Section 2
seems to be using the RFC 2119 text, without accounting for errata, and
an extra RFC 8174 reference appended at the end).

Suresh Krishnan (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-08-08 for -03)
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS.

Warren Kumari No Objection

Comment (2019-08-07 for -02)
Good catch from the Gen-Art review, this needs to be fixed.

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Éric Vyncke No Objection