%% You should probably cite rfc3209 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-09, number = {draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-09}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel/09/}, author = {Daniel O. Awduche and Lou Berger and Der-Hwa Gan and Tony Li and Dr. Vijay Srinivasan and George Swallow}, title = {{RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels}}, pagetotal = 61, year = 2001, month = sep, day = 6, abstract = {This document describes the use of RSVP (Resource Reservation Protocol), including all the necessary extensions, to establish label-switched paths (LSPs) in MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching). Since the flow along an LSP is completely identified by the label applied at the ingress node of the path, these paths may be treated as tunnels. A key application of LSP tunnels is traffic engineering with MPLS as specified in RFC 2702. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}}, }