%% You should probably cite rfc4875 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-07, number = {draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-07}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp/07/}, author = {Dimitri Papadimitriou and Seisho Yasukawa and Rahul Aggarwal}, title = {{Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)}}, pagetotal = 53, year = 2007, month = jan, day = 23, abstract = {This document describes extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for the set up of Traffic Engineered (TE) point-to-multipoint (P2MP) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) in Multi- Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks. The solution relies on RSVP-TE without requiring a multicast routing protocol in the Service Provider core. Protocol elements and procedures for this solution are described. There can be various applications for P2MP TE LSPs such as IP multicast. Specification of how such applications will use a P2MP TE LSP is outside the scope of this document. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}}, }