A Simple Control Protocol for MPLS SFLs
draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control-01
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Stewart Bryant , George Swallow , Siva Sivabalan | ||
Last updated | 2022-01-11 (Latest revision 2021-07-10) | ||
Replaces | draft-bryant-mpls-sfl-control | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews |
TSVART Last Call review
(of
-04)
by Michael Scharf
On the Right Track
GENART Last Call review
(of
-04)
by Ines Robles
Almost ready
|
||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | In WG Last Call | |
Document shepherd | Loa Andersson | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | loa@pi.nu |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In RFC 8957 the concept of MPLS synonymos flow labels (SFL) was introduced. This document describes a simple control protocol that runs over an associated control header to request, withdraw, and extend the lifetime of such labels. It is not the only control protocol that might be used to support SFL, but it has the benefit of being able to be used without modifying of the existing MPLS control protocols. The existence of this design is not intended to restrict the ability to enhance an existing MPLS control protocol to add a similar capability. A Querier MUST wait a configured time (suggested wait of 60 seconds) before re-attempting a Withdraw request. No more than three Withdraw requests SHOULD be made. These restrictions are to prevent overloading the control plane of the actioning router.
Authors
Stewart Bryant
George Swallow
Siva Sivabalan
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)