Allocating and Retiring Special-Purpose MPLS Labels
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Alia Atlas) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you Alia for spending the 1 min to update the abstract. This document is difficult to read, as it's not optimized per question/answer. Look at question 2 in section 2, for which the answer is in section 3, but then points to 3.2 for more details.
Alissa Cooper No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
- p1: 13 pages and updating 13 RFCs! Is that a record? - p7: What is an IETF-wide survey?
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection
Barry Leiba No Objection
No objection here; this all sounds good. Someone might consider whether it's better to correct the grammar of the second sentence in the abstract (I understand what it means to say, but I can't parse it), or let the RFC Editor do it.
(Ted Lemon) No Objection
(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection
This is just a comment, non-blocking, it would be easier to read if section 2. Questions was combined with section 3. Answers.