%% You should probably cite rfc8287 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-09, number = {draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-09}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping/09/}, author = {Nagendra Kumar Nainar and Carlos Pignataro and George Swallow and Nobo Akiya and Sriganesh Kini and Mach Chen}, title = {{Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Traceroute for Segment Routing IGP Prefix and Adjacency SIDs with MPLS Data-plane}}, pagetotal = 21, year = 2017, month = sep, day = 22, abstract = {A Segment Routing architecture leverages source routing and tunneling paradigms and can be directly applied to use of a Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) data plane. A node steers a packet through a controlled set of instructions called segments, by prepending the packet with a Segment Routing header. The segment assignment and forwarding semantic nature of Segment Routing raises additional consideration for connectivity verification and fault isolation for an LSP within a Segment Routing architecture. This document illustrates the problem and defines extensions to perform LSP Ping and Traceroute for a Segment Routing network with a MPLS data plane.}, }