%% You should probably cite rfc8796 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte/08/},
    author =    {Mike Taillon and Tarek Saad and Rakesh Gandhi and Abhishek Deshmukh and Markus Jork and Vishnu Pavan Beeram},
    title =     {{RSVP-TE Summary Fast Reroute Extensions for LSP Tunnels}},
    pagetotal = 21,
    year =      2020,
    month =     jan,
    day =       13,
    abstract =  {This document updates RFC 4090 for the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Traffic-Engineering (TE) procedures defined for facility backup protection. The updates include extensions that reduce the amount of signaling and processing that occurs during Fast Reroute (FRR), and subsequently, improves scalability when undergoing FRR convergence after a link or node failure. These extensions allow the RSVP message exchange between the Point of Local Repair (PLR) and the Merge Point (MP) to be independent of the number of protected Label Switched Paths (LSPs) traversing between them when facility bypass FRR protection is used. The signaling extensions are fully backwards compatible with nodes that do not support them.},
}