Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Management Information Base (MIB)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 14 and is now closed.
(Alex Zinin) Yes
(Harald Alvestrand) No Objection
(Steven Bellovin) No Objection
(Margaret Cullen) No Objection
(Bill Fenner) No Objection
(Ned Freed) No Objection
(Ted Hardie) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Comment (2003-09-17 for -)
Comments on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mib-13: In section 9.5, the use of quotes is confusing. In most cases, it seems appropriate to remove the quotes or replace them with commas or parenthesis. Some of the same paragraphs appear in draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-08 without using quotes. Comments on draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-08: In the first paragraph of section 10, the document acknowledges that the redirection of traffic to unintended destinations can lead to denial of service. Such redirection can also lead to situations where the traffic is delivered, but it is disclosed to unexpected parties. These narrowed consequences also appear in other paragraphs within section 10. Comments on draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib-12: In section 12, the 1st paragraph ends saying: "... with potentially disastrous results." It would be nice to say what some of these results might be. I expect that denial of service and disclosure of traffic to unexpected parties are some of these results. In the last few paragraphs of section 12, the use of quotes is confusing. In most cases, it seems appropriate to remove the quotes or replace them with commas or parenthesis. Some of the same paragraphs appear in draft-ietf-mpls-ftn-mib-08 without using quotes.