%% You should probably cite rfc6375 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile/04/},
    author =    {Dan Frost and Stewart Bryant},
    title =     {{A Packet Loss and Delay Measurement Profile for MPLS-Based Transport Networks}},
    pagetotal = 5,
    year =      2011,
    month =     jul,
    day =       19,
    abstract =  {Procedures and protocol mechanisms to enable efficient and accurate measurement of packet loss, delay, and throughput in MPLS networks are defined in RFC 6374. The MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) is the set of MPLS protocol functions applicable to the construction and operation of packet- switched transport networks. This document describes a profile of the general MPLS loss, delay, and throughput measurement techniques that suffices to meet the specific requirements of MPLS-TP. This document is a product of a joint Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) / International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) effort to include an MPLS Transport Profile within the IETF MPLS and Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) architectures to support the capabilities and functionalities of a packet transport network as defined by the ITU-T. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.},
}