MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the Operational Expectations of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, Optical Transport Network, and Ethernet Transport Network Operators
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-04

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2014-03-27 for -03)
No email
send info
OPS DIR review by Tina:

Summary: Ready with nits

 

Line 410, delete 1st 'when'

 

Line 425, replace 'Switch- over' with 'Switch-over'

 

Line 453, 'is accepted' can be deleted for redundancy

 

Line 549, replace 'transmission' with 'received' or delete it, otherwise ‘integrity of the packet transmission’ does not parse

 

Line 575, delete 'under SD condition' as it is redundant

 

Line 580-583, the phrases:

   "...The packet duplication SHALL continue in the WTR

   state in revertive operation and SHALL stop when the node leaves the

   WTR state.  In non-revertive operation, the packet duplication SHALL

   stop when the SD condition is cleared."

should be rewritten as:

   "When the SD condition is cleared, in revertive operation, the packet duplication

SHALL continue in the WTR state and SHALL stop when the node leaves the

    WTR state; while in non-revertive operation, the packet duplication SHALL stop immediately."

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2014-03-25 for -03)
No email
send info
I only quickly scanned this so maybe I'm totally wrong
here but isn't this spec defining new ways in which an
operator could break a network manually? If so, isn't that
a security consideration? But maybe that's covered in 6378
or 5920 or I'm just talking nonsense:-)

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection