Skip to main content

MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the Operational Expectations of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, Optical Transport Network, and Ethernet Transport Network Operators
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-04

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)

No Objection

(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -03) Unknown

                            
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-03-27 for -03) Unknown
OPS DIR review by Tina:

Summary: Ready with nits

 

Line 410, delete 1st 'when'

 

Line 425, replace 'Switch- over' with 'Switch-over'

 

Line 453, 'is accepted' can be deleted for redundancy

 

Line 549, replace 'transmission' with 'received' or delete it, otherwise ‘integrity of the packet transmission’ does not parse

 

Line 575, delete 'under SD condition' as it is redundant

 

Line 580-583, the phrases:

   "...The packet duplication SHALL continue in the WTR

   state in revertive operation and SHALL stop when the node leaves the

   WTR state.  In non-revertive operation, the packet duplication SHALL

   stop when the SD condition is cleared."

should be rewritten as:

   "When the SD condition is cleared, in revertive operation, the packet duplication

SHALL continue in the WTR state and SHALL stop when the node leaves the

    WTR state; while in non-revertive operation, the packet duplication SHALL stop immediately."
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2014-03-25 for -03) Unknown
I only quickly scanned this so maybe I'm totally wrong
here but isn't this spec defining new ways in which an
operator could break a network manually? If so, isn't that
a security consideration? But maybe that's covered in 6378
or 5920 or I'm just talking nonsense:-)
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Unknown