IPv4 Multihoming Practices and Limitations
draft-ietf-multi6-v4-multihoming-03
Yes
(David Kessens)
No Objection
(Bert Wijnen)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
David Kessens Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-01-20)
Unknown
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART (who had already reviewed it at WG Last Call) Essence of his review: I think its ready to be approved as an informational document
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-01-20)
Unknown
In the security considerations, the author points to the "Threats relating to IPv6 multi-homing solutions," which is good, but I think that this document should also state the implications of the potential solutions on IP security (IPsec). IPsec is discussed very briefly in section 6.3.3, but this is not the only place concerns arise.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown