Skip to main content

IPv4 Multihoming Practices and Limitations
draft-ietf-multi6-v4-multihoming-03

Yes

(David Kessens)

No Objection

(Bert Wijnen)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(David Kessens; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2005-01-20)
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART (who had already reviewed it at WG Last Call)

Essence of his review:

I think its ready to be approved as an informational document

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2005-01-20)
  In the security considerations, the author points to the "Threats
  relating to IPv6 multi-homing solutions," which is good, but I
  think that this document should also state the implications of
  the potential solutions on IP security (IPsec).  IPsec is
  discussed very briefly in section 6.3.3, but this is not the only
  place concerns arise.

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()