PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute (PA) Protocol Compatible with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)
draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-06
Yes
(Tim Polk)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
No Record
(Magnus Westerlund)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-10-25)
Unknown
Who is going to be the Designated Expert for the registries created by the document?
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-09-17)
Unknown
In the last paragraph of section 3.1, a reference to section 4.5 of the PB spec would be helpful, as section 3.4 of the PB spec really describes very little of the PB-PA header. Similarly, a reference to section 4.5 of the PB spec in section 3.3 would be helpful.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-07-15)
Unknown
I strongly agree with Alexey's comment suggesting more discussion of the danger of automatic processing of the content of Remediation instructions. Should the document provide some guidance on what to do if a message contains both a numeric version and a string version (4.2.3, 4.2.4 respectively) draft-sangster-nea-pa-tnc-security-00 is expired. What is the nea wg's current plan for it?
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
No Record
No Record
()
Unknown