Network Mobility Support Terminology
draft-ietf-nemo-terminology-06
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
I understand acronym conflicts are hard to avoid, but "CE" seems a particularly annoying one as it is commonly referred to as "Customer Equipment" in the other half of the int-area. Given that "Entity" isn't a really descriptive term anyway, perhaps something else could be chosen? "CNR" for "Correspondent Node or Router" perhaps (this happens to encode that it can be either a CR and CN as well, which may be considered convenient)? 2.10. Correspondent Entity (CE) Refers to the entity which a Mobile Router or Mobile Network Node attempts to establish a Route Optimization session with. Depending on the Route Optimization approach, the Correspondent Entity maybe a Correspondent Node or Correspondent Router (see also NEMO Route Optimization in Section 7.5)
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection