Adaptive Subscription to YANG Notifications
draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-18

Yes

Mahesh Jethanandani
Mohamed Boucadair

No Objection

Andy Newton
Charles Eckel
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Gorry Fairhurst
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Roman Danyliw
Tommy Jensen

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.

Mahesh Jethanandani
Yes
Mohamed Boucadair
(was Discuss) Yes
Comment (2026-04-14 for -16) Sent 
Hi Qin, Peng, Qiufang, Wei, and Zhixiong, 

Thank you for the effort put into this well-written document. The Experimental approach followed here makes sense. Thanks for the description of the experimental goals.

Thanks to Dhruv Dhody for the two OPSDIR reviews and the authors for taking care of the comments. 

The changes made in [1] adequately addresses comments in my previous ballot [2].

I have one minor comment about -16: 

# server/publisher

As you decided to maintain both server and publisher and that you define "client" such as in:

CURRENT:
   The following terms are defined in [RFC5277], [RFC7950], [RFC8342],
   [RFC8639], [RFC8641] and are not redefined here:

   *  ...

   *  Client
    ...

   *  Publisher

   ...

I think that you need an entry for server as well.

Cheers,
Med

[1] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-netconf-adaptive-subscription-16

[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/xOmD8LV6jXZQfkRFt6HSBS3lRH4/
Andy Newton
No Objection
Charles Eckel
No Objection
Christopher Inacio
No Objection
Comment (2026-04-15 for -17) Sent 
Thank you for a very clearly written draft with a clearly defined experiment including the data that you hope to collect.  Nice work.
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2026-04-14 for -16) Sent 
Thank you to Yoav Nir for their secdir review.

Section 1.2:  This experimental draft actually defines the experiment!  Kudos.

Section 7, para 2:  I recommend using draft-ietf-tls-8446bis vice RFC 8446.  The draft is in Auth 48.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Comment (2026-04-13 for -16) Sent 
Thank you to Joe Touch for his review. I concur with his conclusion when used over a congestion-controlled Internet transport that there are "no particular transport considerations of note".

NiT:
/setting a too high or low threshold may make adaptive subscription degenerated to periodic subscription./ - is this word /degenerate/ rather than /degenerated/?

- Regards, Gorry
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Tommy Jensen
No Objection