Skip to main content

Updates to Using the NETCONF Protocol over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with Mutual X.509 Authentication
draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13-04

Yes

Erik Kline
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
(Martin Duke)
(Robert Wilton)

No Objection

Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
(Andrew Alston)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Erik Kline
Yes
Paul Wouters
(was Discuss) Yes
Comment (2024-01-19) Sent
Thanks for addressing my concerns. I've updated my ballot to Yes
Warren Kumari
Yes
Comment (2023-11-29 for -03) Not sent
Short, sweet, and to the point... however, I'd like to support Paul Wouters' DISCUSS / question -- why doesn't this just point to the TLS algorithms?

(No need to answer me - as along as y'all have thought about it and Paul clears, that's more than good enough for me... :-))
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Yes
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment (2023-11-27 for -03) Sent
Thanks for the work done.

Would it be possible to describe in which situations there could be deviation from the "SHOULD" `Implementations SHOULD support TLS 1.3`(section 4).

I also find a little weird to discuss TLS versions in the section "Cipher Suites".
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Comment (2023-11-28 for -03) Not sent
Thank you for the work on this document.

Many thanks to Jiankang Yao for his ART ART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/WRFIXrvZ_vihcsGf7fhne_dqHac/.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Martin Duke Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -03) Not sent

                            
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -03) Unknown

                            
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03) Not sent