Skip to main content

Logical-Interface Support for IP Hosts with Multi-Access Support
draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-14

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-05-09
14 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2016-04-14
14 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2016-03-23
14 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2016-03-17
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2016-03-14
14 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2016-03-14
14 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2016-03-14
14 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2016-03-14
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2016-03-14
14 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2016-03-14
14 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2016-03-14
14 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2016-03-14
14 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2016-03-14
14 Brian Haberman Ballot approval text was generated
2016-03-13
14 Sri Gundavelli IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2016-03-13
14 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-14.txt
2016-03-03
13 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation
2016-03-03
13 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2016-03-03
13 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
As mentioned by Jürgen Schönwälder in this OPS-DIR:

The 'grandfather' model for interfaces in the OPS world is RFC 2863
and RFC 7223 …
[Ballot comment]
As mentioned by Jürgen Schönwälder in this OPS-DIR:

The 'grandfather' model for interfaces in the OPS world is RFC 2863
and RFC 7223 builds on that. I think your definitions are reasonably
compatible (except that the other models do not restrict a logical
interface to an IP interface). Perhaps it makes sense to discuss this
related work or at least provide pointers, e.g., add a paragraph at
the end of section 2 explaining how the terminology introduced here
relates to RFC 2863 and RFC 7223?

I also believe it would be a nice addition to the draft.
2016-03-03
13 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2016-03-02
13 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot comment]
Juergen  schoenwaelder performed the opsdir review againt version  12
2016-03-02
13 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2016-03-02
13 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2016-03-02
13 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2016-03-02
13 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

I would have thought that noting that different layer 2
interfaces can have different security properties would be
worth noting, even if we …
[Ballot comment]

I would have thought that noting that different layer 2
interfaces can have different security properties would be
worth noting, even if we might not want to recommend that
logical interfaces only group physical interfaces with
similar security properties (which may be an interesting
idea, but I can see it is also likely impractical today).

I note that the secdir review [1] raises the same issue but
I don't think there was a response to that. (If there was,
apologies, I didn't find it;-)

  [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06352.html
2016-03-02
13 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2016-03-01
13 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2016-03-01
13 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2016-03-01
13 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2016-02-29
13 Terry Manderson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson
2016-02-29
13 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2016-02-29
13 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2016-02-25
13 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Ron Bonica
2016-02-25
13 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Ron Bonica
2016-02-23
13 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2016-02-15
13 Brian Haberman IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::AD Followup
2016-02-15
13 Brian Haberman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-03-03
2016-02-15
13 Brian Haberman Ballot has been issued
2016-02-15
13 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2016-02-15
13 Brian Haberman Created "Approve" ballot
2016-02-15
13 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2016-02-15
13 Brian Haberman Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2016-02-15
13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2016-02-15
13 Sri Gundavelli IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2016-02-15
13 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-13.txt
2016-02-05
12 Brian Haberman A new version is needed to address the OPS Dir review comments.
2016-02-05
12 Brian Haberman IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup::Revised I-D Needed from Waiting for Writeup
2016-02-05
12 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2016-02-04
12 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Scott Kelly.
2016-02-03
12 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Jürgen Schönwälder.
2016-02-02
12 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2016-02-02
12 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2016-02-02
12 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'Withdrawn'
2016-02-02
12 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2016-02-02
12 Sabrina Tanamal
(Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-12.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this …
(Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-12.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.

While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, IANA does not object.

If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Sabrina Tanamal
IANA Specialist
ICANN
2016-02-01
12 Ron Bonica Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Ron Bonica.
2016-01-28
12 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ron Bonica
2016-01-28
12 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ron Bonica
2016-01-28
12 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Simon Josefsson
2016-01-28
12 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Simon Josefsson
2016-01-25
12 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder
2016-01-25
12 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder
2016-01-22
12 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2016-01-22
12 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce"
CC: netext@ietf.org, brian@innovationslab.net, bpatil1+ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support@ietf.org, netext-chairs@ietf.org
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce"
CC: netext@ietf.org, brian@innovationslab.net, bpatil1+ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support@ietf.org, netext-chairs@ietf.org
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (Logical-interface Support for Multi-access enabled IP Hosts) to Informational RFC


The IESG has received a request from the Network-Based Mobility
Extensions WG (netext) to consider the following document:
- 'Logical-interface Support for Multi-access enabled IP Hosts'
  as Informational
RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-02-05. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  A Logical-interface is a software semantic internal to the host
  operating system.  This semantic is available in all popular
  operating systems and is used in various protocol implementations.
  The Logical-interface support is required on the mobile node attached
  to a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain, for leveraging various network-based
  mobility management features such as inter-technology handoffs,
  multihoming and flow mobility support.  This document explains the
  operational details of Logical-interface construct and the specifics
  on how the link-layer implementations hide the physical interfaces
  from the IP stack and from the network nodes on the attached access
  networks.  Furthermore, this document identifies the applicability of
  this approach to various link-layer technologies and analyzes the
  issues around it when used in conjunction with various mobility
  management features.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


2016-01-22
12 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2016-01-22
12 Brian Haberman Last call was requested
2016-01-22
12 Brian Haberman Last call announcement was generated
2016-01-22
12 Brian Haberman Ballot approval text was generated
2016-01-22
12 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was generated
2016-01-22
12 Brian Haberman IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2016-01-21
12 Brian Haberman IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2016-01-21
12 Brian Haberman Intended Status changed to Informational
2016-01-21
12 Brian Haberman IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2016-01-21
12 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for /doc/draft-yokota-netlmm-pmipv6-mn-itho-support/
2016-01-21
12 Brian Haberman Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication
2016-01-20
12 Basavaraj Patil Changed document writeup
2015-11-13
12 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-12.txt
2015-03-06
11 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-11.txt
2014-09-03
10 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-10.txt
2014-03-04
09 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-09.txt
2013-10-18
08 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-08.txt
2013-04-24
07 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-07.txt
2012-10-22
06 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-06.txt
2012-04-29
05 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-05.txt
2011-10-31
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-04.txt
2011-09-05
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-03.txt
2011-03-14
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-02.txt
2010-10-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-01.txt
2010-08-25
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support-00.txt